Here's one from left field, how about center(), if goto does what I think it does. It's a getter/setter and pseudo aligns with some OL stuff related to the concept. I think they use map.setCenter, map.getCenter.<br>
<br>-Drew<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Volker Mische <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:volker.mische@gmail.com">volker.mische@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Hi all,<br>
<br>
I just found out that "goto" is a future reserved word in ECMAScript 3 but not in ECMAScript 5. This means we can use it in the future ;)<br>
<br>
This is probably also the reason why so many minifiers crash on the goto function. Although I really like the name, we might should think about changing the name. I have two propositions (feel free to add your own).<br>
<br>
1. go<br>
<br>
Rename "goto" to "go". It doesn't clash with any (future) reserved word and is even shorter<br>
<br>
2. loc/location<br>
<br>
Rename it to "location," or if that's too long just "loc". We don't use any abbreviations at the moment (we use "position", and not "pos"). So "location" would be more consistent. I actually prefer "location" over "go". The reason is that the current "goto" acts as a getter and as a setter, but "goto" is a verb. It makes way more sense to use a subject for things you can set and get (some might call it a resource). You can set a location and get a location, but how to you get a "goto"?<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Volker<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
MapQuery mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:MapQuery@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">MapQuery@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapquery" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/mapquery</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>