[mapserver-commits] r12900 - trunk/docs/en/development/rfc

svn at osgeo.org svn at osgeo.org
Thu Dec 15 09:04:35 EST 2011


Author: sdlime
Date: 2011-12-15 06:04:35 -0800 (Thu, 15 Dec 2011)
New Revision: 12900

Modified:
   trunk/docs/en/development/rfc/ms-rfc-77.txt
Log:
Updates...

Modified: trunk/docs/en/development/rfc/ms-rfc-77.txt
===================================================================
--- trunk/docs/en/development/rfc/ms-rfc-77.txt	2011-12-14 17:17:59 UTC (rev 12899)
+++ trunk/docs/en/development/rfc/ms-rfc-77.txt	2011-12-15 14:04:35 UTC (rev 12900)
@@ -123,19 +123,30 @@
 
 3.3 Bug ID
 ----------
-None assigned. Work is underway in a sandbox (http://svn.osgeo.org/mapserver/sandbox/sdlime/rfc-77/).
+#4127. Work is underway in a sandbox (http://svn.osgeo.org/mapserver/sandbox/sdlime/rfc-77/).
 
 4. Backwards Compatibility
 --------------------------
 At the mapfile level there are no issues, existing mapfiles should run without any change. It is possible that this could
 introduce regressions within MapScript although the scope is not fully known.
 
-4. Enhancements
+4.1 Relationship to Other Outstanding Label Bugs
+------------------------------------------------
+
+* #1355 - None, test is valid w/grouped labels too.
+* #2866 - None.
+* #2981 - None.
+* #3009 - None.
+* #3044 - This is already supported (ticket can be closed).
+* #3335 - Styles are supported for each additional label.
+* #3675 - This will be adressed by this RFC. Label content will be defined by the new TEXT attribute.
+
+5. Enhancements
 ---------------
 Although beyond the scope of this work it seems that some interesting work related to the relative placement of grouped
 labels might be possible. For example, it could be useful to define positions relative to the previous label instead of
 relative to a label point.
 
-5. Voting history
+6. Voting history
 -----------------
 None



More information about the mapserver-commits mailing list