Vote on RFC 31?

[Kralidis,Tom [Burlington]]

> Steve Lime wrote:
> > Hi all: I'd like to call for a vote on RFC 31. I updated the RFC to 
> > try and deal with the points raised. The most significant 
> addition was 
> > more elaboration on security related to URL parameter setting. I 
> > propose a URLCONFIG parameter addition to the webObj that has dual 
> > purposes, 1) to allow URL configuration and 2) to further 
> filter the 
> > config string.
> > 
> > The RFC does not address writing to strings as mentioned by Tamas 
> > (although I think it's a neat idea).
> > 
> > Please let me know if there are additional concerns, suggestions or 
> > clarifications necessary.


+1

..Tom