[mapserver-dev] Re: MapServer 5.4 Plans

[Tamas Szekeres]

Steve,

I guess addressing a simplified version of RFC 33 (
http://mapserver.org/development/rfc/ms-rfc-33.html) would also be doable in
a short therm. I don't think we should completely remove whichItems, however
for the feature queries we could retrieve the features with all items and
store the feature itself in the result cache insted of the reference. (If we
keep on storing the reference as well, then we could maintain the backward
comp. with the older mapscript apps.)


Best regards,

Tamas


2009/1/8 Steve Lime <Steve.Lime at dnr.state.mn.us>

> That's cool. Can dev's provide an update on what stuff can make it in by,
> say,
> the end of Feb? I'll have RFC44 done but need to assess by bugs which there
> are
> probably too many. I'm curious about WMS 1.3 in 5.4. There are folks in
> Europe
> anxiously awaiting that addition.
>
> Steve
>
> >>> On 1/8/2009 at 2:01 PM, in message
> <d2b988930901081201k2e486854s6064fa99ce85071a at mail.gmail.com>, "thomas
> bonfort"
> <thomas.bonfort at gmail.com> wrote:
> > How about a rather quick 5.4 release?
> >
> > the plugin graphics and opengl additions warrant a 6.0, but would
> > delay the release by a solid number of months imho.
> >
> > thomas
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 20:52, Steve Lime <Steve.Lime at dnr.state.mn.us>
> wrote:
> >> I guess we should do something about the blankness. I'm curious what
> folks
> > thing
> >> regarding 5.4 vs. 6.0. Given the graphics overhaul underway, the changes
> > with
> >> URL configuration and such I'm thinking 6.0 personally.
> >>
> >> Steve
> >>
> >>>>> On 1/8/2009 at 1:34 PM, in message <
> 49665544.9040005 at gatewaygeomatics.com>,
> >> Jeff McKenna <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com> wrote:
> >>> Steve Lime wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi all: I know 5.2 isn't out the door but I wanted to get folks
> thinking
> >>>> about timing for 5.4. The FOSS4G meeting always provides a nice
> backdrop
> >>>> for releases. Perhaps 3 months is too soon. What do dev's have on the
> >>>> back burner for the next release? Things I'm keen on or are aware of
> >>>> include:
> >>>>
> >>>>   - rendering terminology and object membership changes (e.g.
> >>>> symbolObj->pattern also available in a styleObj) -- an RFC is on the
> way
> >>>>   - rendering/labeling enhancements Thomas has proposed
> >>>>   - MapInfo-style zooms (Tamas)
> >>>>   - base GML writer support for GML3 and inclusion as an output format
> >>>>   - WFS recognizing templated output formats
> >>>>   - native KML output driver
> >>>>   - native GeoJSON output driver
> >>>>   - one-pass query support
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm sure folks have others. Let's try and get a laundry list together
> >>>> and see if early Oct (even starting the beta process by then may be
> >>>> enough) is feasible. Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>> Steve
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> For the record the release plans are now located in the MapServer Wiki
> >>> (http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/wiki/ReleasePlans) and the 5.4 page
> is
> >>> currently blank.
> >>>
> >>> -jeff
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> mapserver-dev mailing list
> >> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > mapserver-dev mailing list
> > mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-dev/attachments/20090108/8a47754b/attachment.html