[mapserver-dev] RFC 86: Call for vote

[thomas bonfort]

Steve,


On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Stephen Woodbridge <woodbri at swoodbridge.com
> wrote:

> Thomas,
>
> This update helps a lot.
>
> If a user uses a name like %table% and also has a run time parameter
> table=blabla is there any interaction or potential issues.
>

yes, the runtime sub will take precedence and there will be *no* scale
dependant substitution after that (as the %table% part of the string will
have been replaced by "blabla" )

--
thomas


>
> Thank you,
>   -SteveW
>
>
> On 12/13/2012 5:13 AM, thomas bonfort wrote:
>
>> Steve, Daniel, Jeff,
>>
>> In
>> https://github.com/mapserver/**docs/commit/**
>> db54f7cfa603a545a3a9308ee43452**7f462d9f0d<https://github.com/mapserver/docs/commit/db54f7cfa603a545a3a9308ee434527f462d9f0d>
>> I have tried to address the issues you arose.
>> HTH,
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Stephen Woodbridge
>> <woodbri at swoodbridge.com <mailto:woodbri at swoodbridge.**com<woodbri at swoodbridge.com>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>     +1 SteveW  but ...
>>
>>     I think the RFC needs some updating to address Jeff's issue for the
>>     doc team. Also re-reading the RFC I noticed that it does not specify
>>     if the the ranges need to be ordered or not and in the email thread
>>     you mentioned the there has to be a zero item as you check for that.
>>     So I think some additional detail, to help the doc team. This could
>>     be added once the code is checked in based on the final
>> implementation.
>>
>>     BTW, I think this is an excellent design given all the discussion we
>>     had earlier on it and it will a very useful feature for users. Thanks!
>>
>>
>>     On 12/12/2012 6:06 AM, thomas bonfort wrote:
>>
>>         Hi guys,
>>         Please vote on RFC 86, scale dependent token replacements (
>>         http://mapserver.org/__**development/rfc/ms-rfc-86.html<http://mapserver.org/__development/rfc/ms-rfc-86.html>
>>
>>         <http://mapserver.org/**development/rfc/ms-rfc-86.html<http://mapserver.org/development/rfc/ms-rfc-86.html>
>> **> )
>>
>>         I'll start with my +1.
>>
>>         thanks,
>>         thomas
>>
>>
>>         ______________________________**___________________
>>         mapserver-dev mailing list
>>         mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:mapserver-dev at lists.**
>> osgeo.org <mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org>>
>>         http://lists.osgeo.org/__**mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev<http://lists.osgeo.org/__mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev>
>>         <http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev>
>> **>
>>
>>
>>     ______________________________**___________________
>>     mapserver-dev mailing list
>>     mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:mapserver-dev at lists.**osgeo.org<mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>> >
>>     http://lists.osgeo.org/__**mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev<http://lists.osgeo.org/__mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev>
>>     <http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev>
>> **>
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-dev/attachments/20121213/a1738476/attachment.html>