[mapserver-dev] Interpretation of STARTINDEX in WFS : GeoServer and MapServer disagree

[Even Rouault]

Le mercredi 04 janvier 2012 18:28:17, Jeff McKenna a écrit :
> yikes, that does sound interesting.  I wonder if the thread should be
> moved to standards at lists.osgeo.org to make it more accessible?

Yes, would have been wiser indeed. Actually I think the discussion has reached 
its end. So, contrary to what I said just before,  
Panagiotis (Peter) A. Vretanos (WFS spec author) has just clarified his 
position in :

http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=CA%2BnxMTsoM1JshoW47xf0gUzmXaoGTOac%2B2CcHGro-
x4g8nZnbA%40mail.gmail.com&forum_name=geoserver-users

In short, the interpretation of STARTINDEX=1 as the first feature will be 
pushed to the SWG. So no impact on MapServer if this is accepted.

> 
> -jeff
> 
> On 12-01-04 1:20 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > For your information, I've initiated a discussion on geoserver-users
> > about if STARTINDEX should start at 0 (GeoServer 2.1.3) or 1 (MapServer
> > 6), small difference which impacts interoperability of course.
> > 
> > The dicussion becomes very interesting/confusing. Apparently the author
> > of the WFS spec wants to push a change request to make it clear that it
> > should be 0 (, whereas someone from IGN already has pushed a change
> > request to ask for it to be 1. Oh fun !
> > 
> > I let you review the thread in
> > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=geoserver-users
> > 
> > Best regards,
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev