I've opened up bug 2360 for this:<br><br><a href="http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/ticket/2360#preview">http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/ticket/2360#preview</a><br><br>For now people wanting to comply with the Dutch WMS profile can just compile without USE_GD_WBMP I guess.
<br><br>Best regards,<br>Bart<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/23/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Daniel Morissette</b> <<a href="mailto:dmorissette@mapgears.com">dmorissette@mapgears.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Kralidis,Tom [Burlington] wrote:<br>><br>> You're right; image/vnd.wap.wbmp seems to be the definitive way to
<br>> define a wbmp MIME type. I'm not sure of the history of image/wbmp in<br>> MapServer or how it got there, however.<br>><br>> I also wonder on how much image/wbmp is used. Would be interesting to<br>
> hear other dev's thoughts here.<br>><br><br>We probably didn't do much research before deciding to go with<br>image/wbmp ... we probably just assumed that it was the right MIME type<br>to use based on others (image/gif, image/jpeg, etc.).
<br><br>I don't know how much WBMP is used today, or if at all via WMS, but it's<br>there and has been used in the past so I would not remove it unless we<br>really have to. I'd suggest we file a ticket about switching from
<br>image/wbmp to image/vnd.wap.wbmp, with a pointer to the authoritative<br>resource that defines image/vnd.wap.wbmp, and then we could make the<br>change in MapServer. Ideally we'd make the change only in 5.2, but if we
<br>really have to we could backport to 5.0.x.<br><br>Daniel<br>--<br>Daniel Morissette<br><a href="http://www.mapgears.com/">http://www.mapgears.com/</a><br></blockquote></div><br>