+1<br><br>Looks good.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Howard Butler <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:hobu.inc@gmail.com">hobu.inc@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
On Feb 21, 2010, at 11:32 AM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:<br>
><br>
> A few points:<br>
><br>
> 1) What will happen if PROJECTION AUTO is used for a layer type that does<br>
> not implement LayerGetAutoProjection? I hope an error will be issued.<br>
<br>
</div>yes.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
><br>
> 2) Are you proposing to do the implementation for shapefile, OGR, GDAL Raster,<br>
> ArcSDE and PostGIS? I'd be happy to do it for GDAL Raster if you wish.<br>
><br>
<br>
</div>I will do shapefile, SDE, PostGIS, and adapt the existing OGR/GDAL stuff. Hopefully Jim can help with the Oracle driver<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> 3) I think it would have been worth nothing that OGR and raster already<br>
> supported AUTO though this wasn't widely used or known. I don't anticipate<br>
> any compatability issues with changing to this approach.<br>
<br>
</div>The PROJECTION block will now support AUTO as well as "AUTO", but other than that, unchanged.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
mapserver-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:mapserver-dev@lists.osgeo.org">mapserver-dev@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>