Steve,<br><br>I didn't want to promote the OGR style as opposed to SLD or other style representations, on the contrary I would be happy have them implemented all. But at the moment - for practical reasons - implementing the OGR styles would be more straightforward. From the user's perspective having a 'feature style ready' data source (like mapinfo tab) in hand, can easily be converted to any other data sources supported by OGR using a single commandline tool. It would then be reasonable to establish support for rendering those feature styles in mapserver by using the "native" drivers as well, not only with OGR like now. <br>
For this reason I'd encourage to enhance such default style handling (established with this addition) to support more kind of the style representations if someone will have any motivation to implement a parser to those styles. Till that time, having a single implementation in place is much better than denying such support at all. <br>
<br><br>Best regards,<br><br><br>Tamas<br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/9/15 Lime, Steve D (DNR) <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Steve.Lime@state.mn.us">Steve.Lime@state.mn.us</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="EN-US">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Folks are kinda quiet… Recovering from the conference no doubt.
This seems a reasonable idea. Only question I have is promoting the use of OGR
styling as opposed to SLD.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Steve</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"> </span></p>
<div style="border-style: solid none none; border-color: rgb(181, 196, 223) -moz-use-text-color -moz-use-text-color; border-width: 1pt medium medium; padding: 3pt 0in 0in;">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size: 10pt;">From:</span></b><span style="font-size: 10pt;">
<a href="mailto:mapserver-dev-bounces@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">mapserver-dev-bounces@lists.osgeo.org</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:mapserver-dev-bounces@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">mapserver-dev-bounces@lists.osgeo.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Tamas
Szekeres<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, September 11, 2010 11:17 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:mapserver-dev@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">mapserver-dev@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [mapserver-dev] MS RFC 61: Enhance MapServer Feature Style
Support</span></p>
</div><div><div></div><div class="h5">
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi Devs,<br>
<br>
I would require an implementation to extend the current STYLEITEM option to be
used with further drivers in addition to OGR driver. I recall we have already
been discussed this topic with the conclusion that this kind of implementation
would require quite a big effort, but I expect the initial approach (based on
the OGR style) could be implemented fairly easily. For this reason I've created
MS RFC 61 describing the concept to be done, though the proposed changes
haven't yet been implemented by me. I'd anyway be in favour of adding such
solution (or a reasonable variant) to be available in the next release version
(ie. MS 6.0) <br>
<br>
The RFC can be found at:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/browser/trunk/docs/en/development/rfc/ms-rfc-61.txt" target="_blank">http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/browser/trunk/docs/en/development/rfc/ms-rfc-61.txt</a><br>
<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
<br>
Tamas</p>
</div></div></div>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br>