I'll be happy to do some testing on Windows as soon as the implementation is complete.<br><br>Best regards,<br><br>Tamas<br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/11/13 Toby Rahilly <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:toby.rahilly@gmail.com">toby.rahilly@gmail.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">> RFC-50: I think this is out for 6.0 unless those authors are still around.<br>
><br>
<br>
</div>When I left the OpengGL implementation was pretty much done. Todo is<br>
1) Updating for the changing graphics rendering API<br>
2) Cross platform OpenGL context creation support and testing<br>
<br>
The actual rendering code is done.<br>
<br>
Jon and I think we can finish it up before the 15th and will be having<br>
a go over the weekend. If its not ready for the 6.0 feature freeze,<br>
we'll try to leave it in a good state for the next release.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Toby<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Lime, Steve D (DNR)<br>
<<a href="mailto:Steve.Lime@state.mn.us">Steve.Lime@state.mn.us</a>> wrote:<br>
> RFC-50: I think this is out for 6.0 unless those authors are still around.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> RFC-52: The changes I’d like to see are relatively minor (from a coding<br>
> perspective) and are a return to a single getShape() method in MapScript. It<br>
> will break 5.6 scripts but is simpler in the long run. I don’t know that an<br>
> RFC is necessary but I will start a ticket and we can go from there.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> RFC-54: I think Thomas just needs to merge?<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> RFC-58 – RFC-63: Are all basically complete, perhaps need docs though.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> RFC-64: Needs feedback. This may push us back a week or two depending on<br>
> feedback. I think 6.0 is the right time to implement though given the types<br>
> of proposed changes. They are not candidates for minor releases.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Thanks for pushing on this…<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Steve<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> From: <a href="mailto:mapserver-dev-bounces@lists.osgeo.org">mapserver-dev-bounces@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
> [mailto:<a href="mailto:mapserver-dev-bounces@lists.osgeo.org">mapserver-dev-bounces@lists.osgeo.org</a>] On Behalf Of Tamas Szekeres<br>
> Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 6:12 PM<br>
> To: <a href="mailto:mapserver-dev@lists.osgeo.org">mapserver-dev@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
> Subject: [mapserver-dev] 6.0 release plan<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Hi All,<br>
><br>
> In search of my memory (and my mails) the recent plan of the 6.0 release has<br>
> been scheduled as follows:<br>
><br>
> "Plan for a feature freeze on Nov 15th, with a little over 2 months for<br>
> betas, aiming for final release between Jan 15th and 31st"<br>
><br>
> How do we stand with the upcoming activities in the light of this?<br>
><br>
> I can see the following RFCs may be affected or must be scheduled:<br>
><br>
> RFC-50 (OpenGL)<br>
> RFC-52 (One-pass query processing), we wanted to do some rework as far as I<br>
> remember.<br>
> RFC-54 (Rendering overhaul)<br>
> RFC-58 (KML output)<br>
> RFC-62 (Additional WFS GetFeature Output Formats)<br>
> RFC-63 (OpenLayers viewer)<br>
> RFC-64 (Expression parser overhaul)<br>
><br>
> Do we have any other plan which will be covered with an RFC soon? How much<br>
> time the pending efforts will take to be implemented?<br>
> The 6.0 release plan document may also updated with some up to date<br>
> information if possible.<br>
><br>
><br>
> Best regards,<br>
><br>
> Tamas<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
</div></div>> _______________________________________________<br>
> mapserver-dev mailing list<br>
<div class="im">> <a href="mailto:mapserver-dev@lists.osgeo.org">mapserver-dev@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
</div><div><div></div><div class="h5">> <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev</a><br>
><br>
><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>