Hi Daniel,<br><br>Thanks for the feedback on this. I intend to finalize <a href="http://www.mapserver.org/development/rfc/ms-rfc-69.html">RFC-69</a> this weekend. The algorithm itself seems to be fast enough and working correctly, and I'll do some further tests to make sure the query handling satisfies with our requirements.<br>
<br>Best regards,<br><br>Tamas<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2011/2/24 Daniel Morissette <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dmorissette@mapgears.com">dmorissette@mapgears.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi Tamas,<br>
<br>
I'll try to avoid the word "intimidating" ;) ... it's clear to me that you have put lots of thoughts in this clustering idea and in RFC-69, so even if I can't claim to have fully wrapped my head around all the implementation details, I don't feel like I have to. I am comfortable with this RFC and will be ready to support it when time comes.<br>
<br>
Daniel<div class="im"><br>
<br>
<br>
On 11-02-19 05:46 PM, Tamas Szekeres wrote:<br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Dear PSC,<br>
<br>
MS RFC 69 <<a href="http://mapserver.org/development/rfc/ms-rfc-69.html" target="_blank">http://mapserver.org/development/rfc/ms-rfc-69.html</a>> contains<div class="im"><br>
the clustering part of the implementation taken out of RFC-68. This<br>
functionality is being implemented as a new layer data provider, but I<br>
intend to use that in such way which doesn't require to introduce a new<br>
connection type (called as single layer approach). However the<br>
implementation will support to compile this as a standalone provider as<br>
well (ie a plugin) in which this cluster layer is configured as a<br>
separate layer in addition to the source layer (called as multiple layer<br>
approach). The corresponfing ticket<br></div>
<<a href="http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/ticket/3700" target="_blank">http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/ticket/3700</a>> contains a mostly working<br>
implementation, see mapcluster.c<br>
<<a href="http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/attachment/ticket/3700/mapcluster.c" target="_blank">http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/attachment/ticket/3700/mapcluster.c</a>><div class="im"><br>
for the details.<br>
<br>
If you have any further suggestions or concerns, then let me know.<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
<br>
Tamas<br>
<br>
<br>
<br></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
mapserver-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:mapserver-dev@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">mapserver-dev@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev</a><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Daniel Morissette<br>
<a href="http://www.mapgears.com/" target="_blank">http://www.mapgears.com/</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
mapserver-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:mapserver-dev@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">mapserver-dev@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><div style="visibility: hidden; left: -5000px; position: absolute; z-index: 9999; padding: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-top: 0px; overflow: hidden; word-wrap: break-word; color: black; font-size: 10px; text-align: left; line-height: 130%;" id="avg_ls_inline_popup">
</div>