<br><div class="gmail_quote">2011/2/28 Lime, Steve D (DNR) <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Steve.Lime@state.mn.us">Steve.Lime@state.mn.us</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="EN-US"><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span>So the mapdraw.c patch attached to the ticket is not used? I was going to say that it would be nice not to touch the drawing/query code and implement within the layer api only. Looks like that’s the approach you’ve taken. If so then it’s pretty compartmentalized and I’m a +1.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p></div></div></blockquote><div><br>Yes <span>mapdraw.c.patch is obsolete (not sure how it can be removed from trac)</span> <span>msLayerOpen and msLayerWhichShapes are modified in maplayer.c</span> instead.<br>
<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="EN-US"><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span>For RFC’s 68 and 69. Any security issues you can think of? Do the implementations follow the new guidelines Alan put together following his work?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p></div></div></blockquote><div><br>Where can I find the document with these requirements? I'll take a review.<br><br><br>Best regards,<br><br><br>Tamas<br><br></div></div><br><div style="visibility: hidden; left: -5000px; position: absolute; z-index: 9999; padding: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-top: 0px; overflow: hidden; word-wrap: break-word; color: black; font-size: 10px; text-align: left; line-height: 130%;" id="avg_ls_inline_popup">
</div>