<div>+1</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Tamas</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>PS: WRT the issue tracking, couldn't we set up something like <a href="http://hub.qgis.org/">http://hub.qgis.org/</a> which is indeed integrated with an osgeo ID?</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div class="gmail_quote">2012/4/2 thomas bonfort <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:thomas.bonfort@gmail.com">thomas.bonfort@gmail.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT:#ccc 1px solid;MARGIN:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;PADDING-LEFT:1ex" class="gmail_quote"><a href="http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/browser/trunk/docs/en/development/rfc/ms-rfc-84.txt" target="_blank">http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/browser/trunk/docs/en/development/rfc/ms-rfc-84.txt</a><br>
<br>I have updated the RFC with the discussion related to ticket history<br>(which can be nearly seamlessly imported), and removed the option of<br>continuing using the current trac instance.<br><br>The target result can be found here: <a href="https://github.com/mapserver" target="_blank">https://github.com/mapserver</a><br>
(still missing the msautotest and tinyows repos, and with a temporary<br>ms-import one)<br><br>Given that the discussion around this RFC has happened and that most<br>of the reluctances have been sorted out, I would like to call for a<br>
vote on this. In case of success, trac and svn would need to be<br>freezed, and we could be up and running on github by the end of the<br>week.<br><br>I'll start with my +1<br><br>regards,<br>thomas<br>_______________________________________________<br>
mapserver-dev mailing list<br><a href="mailto:mapserver-dev@lists.osgeo.org">mapserver-dev@lists.osgeo.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>