<div dir="ltr">Steve,<div><br></div><div>I'm not sure about a specific failure, this is upon user request. </div><div>Probably they would just ignore everything that cause failures for that layer.</div><div><br></div><div>Tamas</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2017-02-21 21:40 GMT+01:00 Stephen Woodbridge <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:woodbri@swoodbridge.com" target="_blank">woodbri@swoodbridge.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 2/21/2017 3:26 PM, Tamas Szekeres wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi Devs,<br>
<br>
Would that be a reasonable option to skip layers which are failing to<br>
draw and don't abort the entire drawing session?<br>
If yes, should that be a per-layer or per-map setting?<br>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
Tamas,<br>
<br>
How is the layer failing? this is probably key to the problem.<br>
<br>
For example we already have CONFIG ON_MISSING_DATA "IGNORE", what other failures should we ignore?<br>
<br>
Maybe:<br>
<br>
CONFIG ON_CONNECTION_FAILURE "IGNORE"<br>
CONFIG ON_BAD_DATA_FILE "IGNORE"<br>
...<br>
others?<br>
<br>
Some of these may or may not be easy to recover from.<br>
<br>
-Steve W<br>
<br>
<br>
---<br>
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.<br>
<a href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.avast.com/antiviru<wbr>s</a><br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
mapserver-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:mapserver-dev@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">mapserver-dev@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailma<wbr>n/listinfo/mapserver-dev</a></blockquote></div><br></div>