<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><title></title><style type="text/css">p.MsoNormal,p.MsoNoSpacing{margin:0}</style></head><body><div>Thanks Björn and Jeff!<br></div><div><br></div><div>+1 Seth<br></div><div><br></div><div id="sig62266145"><div class="signature">--<br></div><div class="signature">web:<a href="https://geographika.net">https://geographika.net</a><br></div><div class="signature">twitter: @geographika<br></div></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>On Wed, May 18, 2022, at 12:58 PM, Tom Kralidis wrote:<br></div><blockquote type="cite" id="qt" style=""><div>+1<br></div><div><br></div><div><div>..Tom<br></div><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>On May 18, 2022, at 06:54, jbo-ads@mailo.com wrote:<br></div></blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div>+1<br></div><div><div>Jérome<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite" style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0.5em;border-left-color:rgb(0, 0, 255);border-left-style:solid;border-left-width:1px;padding-left:1em;"><div>De : Jeff McKenna <jmckenna@gatewaygeomatics.com><br></div><div> À : mapserver-dev@lists.osgeo.org<br></div><div> Sujet : Re: [mapserver-dev] Proposal/request to implement FlatGeobuf as built-in format<br></div><div> Date : 17/05/2022 15:19:06 Europe/Paris<br></div><div> <br></div><div> Update: Björn has completed the effort (which now includes several <br></div><div> msautotests) and we've created an RFC (137) for the native FlatGeobuf <br></div><div> support: <a href="https://mapserver.org/development/rfc/ms-rfc-137.html" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://mapserver.org/development/rfc/ms-rfc-137.html</a><br></div><div> <br></div><div> I therefore motion to include FlatGeobuf as a native MapServer driver, <br></div><div> per RFC 137, and maintained by Björn Harrtell.<br></div><div> <br></div><div> starting with my +1<br></div><div> <br></div><div> Some other interesting updates:<br></div><div> <br></div><div> - great to see changes here made through testing benefiting so many <br></div><div> other projects<br></div><div> <br></div><div> - here is an updated benchmark result (that is mentioned in the RFC) :<br></div><div> <br></div><div> <br></div><div> FlatGeobuf (native) 0.008s<br></div><div> Shapefile (native) 0.010s<br></div><div> FlatGeobuf (OGR) 0.013s<br></div><div> Shapefile (OGR) 0.023s<br></div><div> GeoPackage (OGR) 0.042s<br></div><div> SpatiaLite (OGR) 0.045s<br></div><div> PostGIS (native) 0.053s<br></div><div> GeoJSON (OGR) 0.089s<br></div><div> <br></div><div> (that was with yesterday's main, GDAL 3.4.3, with MS4W on Windows)<br></div><div> <br></div><div> - with all this testing done, and the existing FlatGeobuf documentation <br></div><div> effort, it will be very easy to add this to the main documentation now...<br></div><div> <br></div><div> Thanks,<br></div><div> <br></div><div> <br></div><div> -Björn & Jeff<br></div></blockquote></div><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br></div><div><span>MapServer-dev mailing list</span><br></div><div><span>MapServer-dev@lists.osgeo.org</span><br></div><div><span>https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev</span><br></div></div></blockquote></div><div>_______________________________________________<br></div><div>MapServer-dev mailing list<br></div><div><a href="mailto:MapServer-dev@lists.osgeo.org">MapServer-dev@lists.osgeo.org</a><br></div><div><a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev</a><br></div><div><br></div></blockquote><div><br></div></body></html>