MapServer Foundation - Open Letter

Gary Lang gary.lang at AUTODESK.COM
Wed Nov 30 10:24:35 EST 2005


That wasn't the intention. It's just based on an observation made by
DanielM which was that MSE seemed to be tailored more for the
enterprise. I don't know MS's user base as well as he does, so I
respected his and Frank's thoughts on it I recall that the name was
suggested by Daniel, and so we took the name suggestion and ran  with
it.

But I see the point here. These are good points. I no more want to see
MapServer be characterized as being incapable of being used by an
enterprise than I want to see MSE be characterized as not being a
community product.

-----Original Message-----
From: UMN MapServer Users List [mailto:MAPSERVER-USERS at LISTS.UMN.EDU] On
Behalf Of thomas bonfort
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 5:33 AM
To: MAPSERVER-USERS at LISTS.UMN.EDU
Subject: Re: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] MapServer Foundation - Open Letter

On 11/30/05, Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam at pobox.com> wrote:
> On 11/29/05, Adam <adam at jamradar.com> wrote:
> > MapServer Community Edition is good.
>
> Folks,
>
> I think this name sucks.  I hope, and expect a community to form 
> around MapServer Enterprise, and naming ours something like this is a 
> smack in the face to their community.

While I agree completely with that point, following the same reasoning
implies that  MS cheetah hasn't any entreprise capabilities cheers, tb



More information about the mapserver-users mailing list