Raster data experience

[luca marletta]

I've never perform benchmark but I have a bunch of raster, tif format,
each about 7Mb and with tileindex it's pretty quick.
Jpeg is lower in size but due to compression it asks more CPU work for sure

luca

On 2/23/06, Frode Wiseth Jørgensen <fwj at avinet.no> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have a quite large raster dataset (JPG) which i use with TILE/TILEINDEX,
> It works pretty nice, but is extremely slow processing.
>
> Any suggestions on which kind of format I should use instead of JPG, which
> Mapserver handles more effective?

--
luca marletta