Raster data experience

[Flavio Hendry]

Hi Frode

We had the same experence with JPEG, depending on output format
definitions. I'd use TIFF (or if you have access/can convert it, I'd use
ECW, incredibly fast!).

Mit freundlichem Gruss / Best Regards
Flavio Hendry

----------------------------------------------------------------
TYDAC NEWS http://www.tydac.ch/german/index.php?menu=News_actual
----------------------------------------------------------------
############      Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Kind Regards
############             mailto:flavio at tydac.ch
############         TYDAC AG - http://www.tydac.ch
####    ####        Geographic Information Solutions
####    ####         Luternauweg 12 -- CH-3006 Bern
############   Tel +41 (0)31 368 0180 - Fax +41 (0)31 368 1860
----------------------------------------------------------------


-----Original Message-----
From: Frode Wiseth Jørgensen <fwj at AVINET.NO>
To: MAPSERVER-USERS at LISTS.UMN.EDU
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 02:04:53 -0600
Subject: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] Raster data experience

> Hi!
> 
> I have a quite large raster dataset (JPG) which i use with
> TILE/TILEINDEX,
> It works pretty nice, but is extremely slow processing.
> 
> Any suggestions on which kind of format I should use instead of JPG,
> which
> Mapserver handles more effective?
> 
> 
> Regards
> Frode