WMS, WCS, WFS

[Kralidis,Tom [Burlington]]

Try the MapServer OGC Web Services Workshop:
 
http://devgeo.cciw.ca/ms_ogc_workshop/index.html
 
This workshop has slides which discuss the various OGC specifications (overview, relation to MapServer, etc.).
 
..Tom
 

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: UMN MapServer Users List on behalf of Thip 
	Sent: Sun 19-Mar-06 20:09 
	To: MAPSERVER-USERS at lists.umn.edu 
	Cc: 
	Subject: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] WMS, WCS, WFS
	
	

	Dear all,
	
	Is there anyone know the different of WMS, WCS and WFS? Or any where that I
	can find those information.
	
	Thanks,
	Thip
	
	----- Original Message -----
	From: "Siki Zoltan" <siki at AGT.BME.HU>
	To: <MAPSERVER-USERS at LISTS.UMN.EDU>
	Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 2:31 AM
	Subject: Re: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] Improving Performance... {Scanned}
	
	
	> Hi,
	>
	> AFAIK the fastest solution for static maps are the shape files with
	> spatial index (qix).
	>
	> Zoltan
	>
	> On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, Jelmer Baas wrote:
	>
	> > Paul james wrote:
	> > > Hello all !
	> > > I have a app with one layer (roads - ~600k lines) ... And It take
	about
	> > > 10 sec to draw... Its using postgre/postgis... And my server is a
	ADM64
	> > > 3800+ , 2GB Ram...
	> > > Is there any kind to optimize that?
	> >
	> > As far as I found out, drawing from MapInfo .TAB files is blazingly
	> > fast. Drawing the whole of the netherlands, the mainroads, the natural
	> > feautures, a lot of other stuff only takes < 0.5 sec on a machine that's
	> > less fast as yours.
	> >
	> > If the road info is static, I'd try converting it to MapInfo files. .TAB
	> > is faster (at least for me) than shape+index, as well.
	> >
	> >