[mapserver-users] Mapfile VS MapScript performance

[Mike Saunt]

As the cgi is robust and heavily tested I would think you would save
massive amounts of developer time in not writing python wrapper code too!
On Nov 7, 2012 8:42 AM, "Umberto Nicoletti" <umberto.nicoletti at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I have tested cgi against python mapscript (with mod_python) and the
> performance improvement, as expected, is massive.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Spirifer <ready945 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would to use MapServer to create WMS/WFS services.
>>
>> I think to compare 2 systems to produce services:
>> 1) Apache + MapServer CGI + static mapfile (.map)
>> 2) Apache + MapScript PHP + map configuration in cache
>>
>> Somebody has tested the performance between the mapfile and MapScript ?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/Mapfile-VS-MapScript-performance-tp5014463.html
>> Sent from the Mapserver - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapserver-users mailing list
>> mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-users mailing list
> mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/attachments/20121107/423ffa32/attachment.html>