<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>MAPSERVER-USERS Digest - 1 Aug 2005 to 2 Aug 2005 (#2005-221)</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2668" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>Hi all.<BR>I started to build my Mapserver Mapfile data using shapefiles
and now I am moving all the vector layers into Postgis. I wonder what to do with
tileindexed data. </DIV>
<DIV>Tileindexing improved the performance vs. the huge vector shapefile but how
is the comparison with the PostGis table? I suppose that the tileindexed
shapefile should still be faster than the gist indexed large Postgis table, but
i could be wrong. From an organizative point of view I would prefer to have
all the vector data into Postgis but I would accept to pay too much in
performance. Did anybody already do such a benchmark?</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>ps: <FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>Before
inquiring the Mapserver list i tried to sumbit this question to the Postgis list
with no feedback. </FONT></FONT><BR></DIV></BODY></HTML>