<div dir="ltr">Don't bother - I've found the unswer. As I supposed the reason is in the EXTENT parameters. Luckily we have a tool like ogrinfo. In the xml file of a layer I had <br><lboundng><br> <leftbc Sync="TRUE">117565.994059</leftbc><br>
<rightbc Sync="TRUE">629900.812795</rightbc><br> <bottombc Sync="TRUE">4566280.510742</bottombc><br> <topbc Sync="TRUE">4904916.677351</topbc><br></lboundng><br>
<br>But the ogrinfo on the same shapefile gave:<br>Extent: (217768.750667, 4598985.999868) - (509640.935799, 4743932.000236)<br>which, as you can see, is quite different. And obviously the second was true for the tif extent of the tif image.<br>
<br>I still don't know why I had different extents in the files of the same layer, but I had not produces these files, so I stop guessing.<br><br>Bye,<br>Minka<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Minka Stoyanova <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:minka.stoyanova@gmail.com">minka.stoyanova@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div dir="ltr">Dear list,<br><br>All layers are well visualised on my query map. But the piece of map shown on the query map is not at all correctly shown with the rectangle on the reference map. Where could be the reason?<br>
<br>thanks!<br>Minka<br></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>