<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <p>Re Featured Sponsor:</p>
    <p>I think it a good idea for encouraging more sponsors. I'm open to
      showing all sponsors on rotation on the web page, weighted by how
      much the sponsor pays.</p>
    <p>A Platinum sponsor pays 40 times more than a Bronze sponsor, and
      so should get at least 40 times more imprints. (Probably 80 times
      more imprints as a sweetener).</p>
    <p>With regards to who we select as sponsors. My first reaction is
      to suggest that any company prepared to pay OSGeo money should be
      allowed to sponsor. (That process should be reasonably self
      selecting). However, Eli makes good points about caring about a
      Sponor's business.</p>
    <p>I'd be inclined to work on a principle of ensuring sponsors "Do
      no evil (to OSGeo's reputation)". If a software hosting company
      which doesn't seem to be obviously using much OSGeo Software, but
      still wants to sponsor us, that should be ok.</p>
    <p>So I'd suggest Eli's selection criteria for OSGeo sponsors could
      be couched as "Expectations of OSGeo sponsors":</p>
    <p><i>We are aware that OSGeo sponsorship effects the reputation of
        both the sponsor and OSGeo, usually in a positive way. That is
        why you are considering sponsorship. In order to ensure the
        relationship is a positive one, we have the following
        expectations of our sponsors: ...</i></p>
    <p><i>* Add in "do no evil" type points</i><br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 25/06/2016 3:30 AM, David Percy
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CANFXLQtENmHLdiK_ptFWhMGw+ouo8ZVDF_gvYRicbZFPhTFpxg@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">I like Eli's suggestion to refund the donations and
        remove the unrelated sponsors.</div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Jody
          Garnett <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:jody.garnett@gmail.com" target="_blank">jody.garnett@gmail.com</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div dir="ltr">We could also choose to just list silver and
              above sponsors in rotation on our main page?</div>
            <div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all">
              <div>
                <div data-smartmail="gmail_signature">
                  <div dir="ltr">
                    <div>
                      <div dir="ltr">
                        <div>--</div>
                        <div>Jody Garnett</div>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
              <br>
              <div class="gmail_quote"><span class="">On 24 June 2016 at
                  02:00, Jeroen Ticheler <span dir="ltr"><<a
                      moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="mailto:jeroen.ticheler@geocat.net"
                      target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:jeroen.ticheler@geocat.net">jeroen.ticheler@geocat.net</a></a>></span>
                  wrote:<br>
                </span>
                <div>
                  <div class="h5">
                    <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                      .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">+1
                      on not accepting unrelated sponsors. The current
                      Bronze sponsors listed seem to be advertising
                      totally different stuff. No good marketing for
                      OSGeo.<br>
                      Cheers,<br>
                      Jeroen<br>
                      <br>
                      GeoCat Bridge for ArcGIS allows instant publishing
                      of data and metadata on GeoServer, MapServer,
                      PostGIS and GeoNetwork. Visit <a
                        moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://geocat.net"
                        rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://geocat.net">http://geocat.net</a></a>
                      for details.<br>
                      _________________________<br>
                      <span><font color="#888888">Jeroen Ticheler<br>
                          GeoCat bv<br>
                          Veenderweg 13<br>
                          6721 WD Bennekom<br>
                          Tel: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="tel:%2B31%20%280%296%2081286572"
                            value="+31681286572" target="_blank">+31
                            (0)6 81286572</a><br>
                          <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="http://geocat.net" rel="noreferrer"
                            target="_blank">http://geocat.net</a><br>
                        </font></span>
                      <div>
                        <div><br>
                          > Op 23 jun. 2016 om 21:11 heeft Eli Adam
                          <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="mailto:eadam@co.lincoln.or.us"
                            target="_blank">eadam@co.lincoln.or.us</a>>
                          het volgende geschreven:<br>
                          ><br>
                          > Hi Jody and all,<br>
                          ><br>
                          >> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:39 AM,
                          Jody Garnett <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="mailto:jody.garnett@gmail.com"
                            target="_blank">jody.garnett@gmail.com</a>>
                          wrote:<br>
                          >> Question for the marketing committee,
                          since it is a bit about the messaging<br>
                          >> on our website.<br>
                          >><br>
                          >> With a revised sponsorship approach
                          we are collecting more sponsors (yay!)<br>
                          ><br>
                          > Great, good work.  If we have stable
                          revenue from something other than<br>
                          > FOSS4G, that makes it easier to take
                          different approaches with the<br>
                          > conference.  And additional diversified
                          foundation revenue is always<br>
                          > good.<br>
                          ><br>
                          >><br>
                          >> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="http://www.osgeo.org/content/sponsorship/sponsors.html"
                            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.osgeo.org/content/sponsorship/sponsors.html</a><br>
                          >><br>
                          >> One surprise this year is collecting
                          bronze sponsors (this was at the $500<br>
                          >> USD level) that are not directly from
                          our industry. Is this something we<br>
                          >> should care about from a
                          marketing/branding perspective?<br>
                          ><br>
                          > Yes, we should care.  Our focus is open
                          source geospatial software;<br>
                          > we're not an advertising platform.  The
                          reason that we are getting<br>
                          > unrelated sponsors is that we are selling
                          a really good page rank at a<br>
                          > very low price.  I think that other OSGeo
                          project have had to decline<br>
                          > sponsorships from adult or other
                          non-related websites.<br>
                          ><br>
                          >><br>
                          >> Background: The original intension
                          here was to have a way for small business<br>
                          >> to be represented in our organization
                          by offering a lower price point. The<br>
                          >> cumulative sponsorship (combining
                          support of OSGeo events, projects,<br>
                          >> initiatives) also meets this need.<br>
                          ><br>
                          > If we raised our prices so that bronze
                          sponsorship was no longer an<br>
                          > incredibly good deal for the page rank,
                          then this would end.  (i.e. We<br>
                          > won't ever have an over abundance of
                          unrelated platinum sponsors.)<br>
                          > However, the goal is to raise sponsorship
                          and a reasonable entry point<br>
                          > for small businesses which often make
                          substantial contributions to<br>
                          > OSGeo projects.<br>
                          ><br>
                          >><br>
                          >> One idea (for next year) is to ask
                          sponsors for a link to their open source<br>
                          >> landing page (example, example,
                          example, example).<br>
                          ><br>
                          > I think that we should have a requirement
                          that sponsors be at least<br>
                          > related to the geospatial industry.  This
                          requirement can easily be<br>
                          > applied with just a bit of thought.  If
                          denied sponsors don't like<br>
                          > their denial, they can appeal to the
                          Board and make their case that<br>
                          > they are geospatially related.  I would
                          be in favor of returning those<br>
                          > unrelated sponsors' money and removing
                          them.  At least no more<br>
                          > unrelated sponsors and no option for
                          renewal for the existing<br>
                          > unrelated sponsors if we don't refund and
                          remove.<br>
                          ><br>
                          > My thoughts, Eli<br>
                          ><br>
                          >> --<br>
                          >> Jody Garnett<br>
                          >><br>
                          >>
                          _______________________________________________<br>
                          >> Marketing mailing list<br>
                          >> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="mailto:Marketing@lists.osgeo.org"
                            target="_blank">Marketing@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
                          >> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing"
                            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing</a><br>
                          >
                          _______________________________________________<br>
                          > Marketing mailing list<br>
                          > <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="mailto:Marketing@lists.osgeo.org"
                            target="_blank">Marketing@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
                          > <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing"
                            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing</a><br>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </blockquote>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
              <br>
            </div>
            <br>
            _______________________________________________<br>
            Marketing mailing list<br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:Marketing@lists.osgeo.org">Marketing@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing</a><br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
        <br clear="all">
        <div><br>
        </div>
        -- <br>
        <div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">David
          Percy ("Percy")<br>
          -Geospatial Data Manager<br>
          -Web Map Wrangler<br>
          -GIS Instructor<br>
          Portland State University<br>
          -<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://gisgeek.pdx.edu"
            target="_blank">gisgeek.pdx.edu</a><br>
          -<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://geology.pdx.edu"
            target="_blank">geology.pdx.edu</a><br>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Marketing mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Marketing@lists.osgeo.org">Marketing@lists.osgeo.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing</a></pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Cameron Shorter,
Software and Data Solutions Manager
LISAsoft
Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009

P +61 2 9009 5000,  W <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.lisasoft.com">www.lisasoft.com</a>,  F +61 2 9009 5099</pre>
  </body>
</html>