[Journal] Sections versus subsections

[Micha Silver]

Hi Tyler:


Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo) wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> I'm getting close to wrapping up the journal.
>
> In several articles I'm finding that we have used a different 
> hierarchy than I would have expected.  Now I'm wondering if it is for 
> a reason.
>
>
.....
> This makes "History" and "Details" a child of "Introduction" which 
> makes no sense to me.  So I have been changing them all to \section 
> instead.  If there is a problem with the way we are rendering section 
> titles than let's fix that so we can maintain a proper logical hierarchy.
>
> Am I missing something?  Please let me know and I'll change them back 
> if I broke something.
>
There are two articles where I notices that the "subsection" division 
makes sense.
In the write up on deegree there's a section called "Components", and 
after that explanations on deegree iGeoPortal, deegree iGeoSecurity, 
etc. These should probably stay as subsections.
Also the article on PyWPS. There's a section entitled "Using ka-map and 
PyWPS...", after which come subsections on Embrio and Wiuw.  Again you 
might leave these formatted as subsections.
In addition, the final coverage of "Developer Updates" is organized, as 
we thought a few weeks ago, as one article with sections for each 
project, and the "items" under each section (each separate project 
update) are marked as subsections.

Let us know if there's anything else you need help with.

Regards,
Micha
> Tyler
> _______________________________________________
> newsletter mailing list
> newsletter at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/newsletter
>
>
>
> This mail was sent via Kinneret Mail-SeCure System.
>
>