[Journal] Volume 5 and beyond

Sunburned Surveyor sunburned.surveyor at gmail.com
Thu May 14 10:53:23 EDT 2009


I'd like to offer help in two (2) areas:

 - Tyler mentioned "one or two others interested in helping oversee
the process". I would be able to devote a couple hours a week to
helping move the ball forward on each issue. I'm thinking about
contacting authors and editors with friendly reminders about deadlines
and helping them work through any road blocks they may have run into.
I could help maintain a calendar or spreadsheet for this purpose.
(Perhaps this tracking functionality is built into OJS?)

- Tyler mentioned "latex experts to help improve look and feel of
journal, plus help convert contributed content". I've discovered that
I'm not a huge fan of latex. :] I'm not sure if we have contributors
to the journal that feel strongly about its continued use, but I would
be willing to work up a layout for the Journal in Scribus. This would
allow authors to submit articles in DOC or ODF format, and would give
us some more exact control over the layout of the journal. This might
be worth at least a try? If there were another Scribus fan among us
that was willing to help me, we might relieve Tyler of the actual
layout and graphical production duties.

Landon

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Rafal Wawer
<Rafal.Wawer at sadl.kuleuven.be> wrote:
> Tyler,
> I think I can devote most of my overhead (1-2 days/month) to the work for the Journal.
> Not much, but within this timeframe I would be happy to help.
>
> Best regards:
> Raf
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo) [mailto:tmitchell at osgeo.org]
> Sent: 14 May 2009 16:11
> To: Rafal Wawer
> Cc: OSGeo Journal
> Subject: Re: [Journal] Volume 5 and beyond
>
> Hi Rafal,
> I share your enthusiasm and direction for the Journal.  Once I've got this report off my plate, then we will have to test the waters to see if we can truly handle this direction.  It is a lot of work and to make it a success there will need to be more volunteers who can help with some of the day-to-day management of the journal processes, since I'm the main bottleneck at the moment :-)  In 2007 we had a couple additional editors who were able to help at all levels, but some of them are unavailable now, and some section editors are too busy now too.
>
> It seems we have lots of great reviewers.  I think we have enough section editors, and I think there are lots of authors waiting to contribute too.  But further than that we need:
> * one or two others interested in helping oversee the process, e.g. a senior editor
> * technical assistant (could be same as above) to help manage various tasks in the online system/tools
> * latex experts to help improve look and feel of journal, plus help convert contributed content.
> * peer review panel - some who are most familiar with issues of peer review and who can help make sure we "do it right"
> * promoters - to advertise and promote the journal to appropriate places
>
> I'm sure there is more, but thought I'd mention these in case.
>
> Best wishes!
> Tyler
>
>
> On 14-May-09, at 1:22 AM, Rafal Wawer wrote:
>
>> <So far the Journal was mainly a container for the annual report,
>> while the papers appeared rather rarely.> I was rather hasty with that
>> statement, although it is true for the period of my interest in te
>> Journal - beginning of 2008.
>> Year 2007 was very sucessfull for the Journal - 3 issues, inclusing
>> FOSS4G2007 proceedings. Issue 4, containing the Annual Report is
>> already published and  "cannot be undone" (-; I propose the issue 5
>> and all the future issues to be released as a scientific/academic
>> editions. No 5 should be publishable in 2009, as the papers are
>> already after reviews. It would be very nice to achieve several issues
>> a year, as in 2007. The current activity in the FOSS4G domain would
>> certailny fill them up. I think a good way to increase the number of
>> Journal issues to a level of 2007 would be to publish proceedings of
>> the FOSS4G related conferences and workshops, not only those organized
>> by OSGeo. The materials of those events often dwell on the webpages of
>> the organizing bodies, hardly discoverable by readers. I think the
>> organizers would be interested in publishing in OSGeoJournal, or its
>> special editions.
>> The Journal has no impact factor assigned, however it has potentially
>> big thematic  community of readers.
>>
>> Best regards:
>> Raf
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo) [mailto:tmitchell at osgeo.org]
>> Sent: 13 May 2009 17:19
>> To: Rafal Wawer
>> Cc: OSGeo Journal
>> Subject: Re: [Journal] Volume 5 and beyond
>>
>>
>> On 13-May-09, at 1:53 AM, Rafal Wawer wrote:
>>> I always wondered if the OSGeo annual reports could be kept "outside"
>>> the Journal.
>>> So far the Journal was mainly a container for the annual report,
>>> while
>>> the papers appeared rather rarely.
>>> As we already streamlined the admission/review process, wouldn't
>>> it be
>>> nice to finally separate annual reports from the papers, placing the
>>> reports not in the Journal but 4ex in annals, parallel to it?
>>> The numeration of the Journal would be then given only to scientific
>>> editions.
>>> Now, it is quite confusing for the Journal's (potential) readers -
>>> looking for papers they mostly find OSGeo annual reports. (-;
>>
>> Definitely possible to move it outside, if I understand properly
>> your concern.  We have had 3 'normal' issues, plus one annual
>> report so far.  So if people cannot find the other 3 issues then we
>> have a bigger problem.  I think we need a way to easily promote all
>> these articles we've collected.
>>
>> Here are some of the current ways:
>>
>> 1/ http://www.osgeo.org/ojs/index.php/journal  - lists all previous
>> volumes so readers can find one to look at.  (I need to add the
>> French ones into OSJ still).  With one click they see an article
>> list for that volume.
>>
>> 2/ You can also use the "browse by..." options on lower right of
>> that web page.  E.g. Browse by authors gives you a great list in
>> alphabetical order.
>>
>> 3/ The search box also gives you great results from searching
>> abstracts, authors, titles, etc.
>>
>> What other ways can we make this clearer to potential readers?  Any
>> ideas for a web page to help display things in a better way - let's
>> try them!
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> newsletter mailing list
> newsletter at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/newsletter
>


More information about the newsletter mailing list