[Journal] Need Volunteers

[Sunburned Surveyor]

Dimitris,

Thank you for volunteering to help us with the peer review article in
Volume 6. I'll see if I can figure out how to add you as a reviewer to
that section. In the meantime, I may just e-mail you a copy of the
article text.

I'll let you coordinate the review with Rafal, who has been doing a
great job taking care of this section.

When the review is complete, let me know. I'll get the comments from
the three reviews packaged up and sent to the author.

Rafal or Daniel: Can we sent a short e-mail to the author of the
article letting him/her know our review is still in progress?

Thanks for the help.

Landon

On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:21 AM, Dimitris Kotzinos <kotzino at csd.uoc.gr> wrote:
> Hi Rafal,
> good morning to you, too! :)
>
> I know more or less the process, so I think I will manage - for the blind
> reviews I was merely referring to the fact that we can be more flexible of
> course without compromising in any sense the reviewing process.
> As for the "open access" vs. traditional publishing I think that it is a
> matter of time. If a journal can guarantee the quality and will be indexed
> will eventually gain the necessary momentum. On the other hand, I think that
> it is understandable that this is a constant stream of revenue for the
> publishers and they are not very keen of loosing it.
> The "messiness" of the online open access journals is another issue. I think
> if online open access journals want to be taken seriously they should adopt
> some of the well established processes in publishing, including formatting
> but also having steady publication cycles, a not always changing scientific
> board and Editor-in-chief, call for papers to be published well in advance,
> etc.
> Of course, one issue of concern (especially in the academic world) id how
> many journals can this world handle/use/accept and where are we going with
> all the efforts, regardless of being open access or not ... But, this is
> another long painful discussion ...
>
> Best,
>
> Dimitris
>
>
>
>
> Rafal Wawer wrote:
>>
>> Kalimera Dimitris,
>> Welcome on board! (-:
>>
>> For the secton editor working on OJS assuring double-blind review is not
>> that difficult. You just remove authors' names in the text sent to
>> reviewers. OJS cares for the rest, as every decision must go through the
>> section editor and there is no direct connection between author and
>> reviewer. You have to remember to check reviewers' comments thought, whether
>> they are accidentaly signed. (-;
>>
>> IMO assuring double-blind review is a must at least in the peer review
>> section. Recently I had an interesting conversation with one of professors
>> about OpenAccess journals. Good publications tend to go to indexed journals
>> although OpenAccess seem to promiss wider dissmination and citations...
>> "Open journals do not have calculated IF" and IMO not applying good
>> editorial practise won't help in taking them seriously. (-;
>> Everyone says that OpenAcces is future, everyone complains about the
>> commercial titles - "robbing authors from coyrights and money". As author
>> you pay for the paper to be published, you loose the rights to it and
>> everyone has to pay to read it. On the other hand from scientific point fo
>> view, OpenAcces is still not taken seriously enough, so the scientists
>> (especially those mature ones) complain but don't do much to change the
>> status quo. They also complain, that open journals are often quite messy -
>> "gorilla journals" (-; as basing upon volountary work is often a sunstantial
>> challange - I think we know it to be true (-;
>> For me is is a pitty, that through "traditional" scientific publication
>> system, the access to knowledge, especially in the environmental domain, is
>> closed or limited for the developing countries.
>>
>> Best regards:
>> Raf
>>
>> Dr. Rafal Wawer
>> K.U.Leuven
>> R&D Division SADL (Spatial Application Division)
>> Celestijnenlaan 200e bus 2224
>> BE-3001 Leuven-Heverlee
>> Belgium
>> tel. 0032 16 329731
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: newsletter-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
>> [mailto:newsletter-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Dimitris Kotzinos
>> Sent: 09 February 2010 08:26
>> To: newsletter at lists.osgeo.org
>> Subject: [Journal] Need Volunteers
>>
>> Landon,
>>
>> I can do the Peer Review Section.
>> I will just need to know what is there and for you to add me as a section
>> editor.
>>
>> As for the blind review it usually goes both ways: the reviewer does not
>> know the authors' names and the authors never learn who the reviewers were.
>> But if we are talking for an article or two there is no need for the
>> section editors to make things amazingly complicated - we can trust them
>> that they will find the proper reviewers if they cannot or do not want to
>> review them by themselves. Moreover we are not a peer reviewed journal so we
>> do not need to be extremely strict, as long as we keep the good practices
>> and defend the name of the journal.
>>
>> Dimitris
>> _______________________________________________
>> newsletter mailing list
>> newsletter at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/newsletter
>
> _______________________________________________
> newsletter mailing list
> newsletter at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/newsletter
>