[Journal] Vol 6. looking good...

[Sunburned Surveyor]

Tyler,

Sorry I didn't get back to you yesterday.

Volume 6 looks good. My only important comment was about heading
consistency, but we can work on that in the next issue. I'd go ahead
and publish.

I look forward to working with everyone on Volume 7.

Landon

On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Tyler Mitchell
<tmitchell.osgeo at shaw.ca> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've been looking through the current draft PDF and don't see any
> showstoppers to releasing it.  Do you?
>
> http://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/journal/volume_6/en-us/OSGeoJournal_vol6.pdf
>
> Does the attached article list confirm all the expected articles are
> appearing?
>
> Landon mentioned a few questions, but aside from a few look and feel things
> I don't think there is much outstanding.  The table borders all look good to
> me now.  The bullet lists are always an irritating issue due to vertical
> justification, but it's not the end of the world at this point.
>
> Any final comments or commitments to fixing it all up before I or Landon
> push out an announcement?  Best of all, we can continue to improve the
> digital version when we find issues or ways to improve it.
>
> Tyler
>
> p.s. Due to the high number of complex tables, this issue seemed unduly
> difficult to layout properly.  I mention this because it's certainly not the
> norm, as most of you already know.
>
> _______________________________________________
> newsletter mailing list
> newsletter at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/newsletter
>
>