I didn't see any follow up on Tyler's comment below, but I agree with the numbering idea. It seems like a nice standard to follow (i.e. new Volume number each year, with several Issues per year). - Dan<br><br><div>
<span class="gmail_quote">On 5/22/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo)</b> <<a href="mailto:tmitchell@osgeo.org">tmitchell@osgeo.org</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Some have suggested to change a simple Volume system to Volume and<br>Number. I.e. Volume 1, Number 1 and our upcoming would be Volume 1,<br>Number 2. I think that's how it goes. It would be nice to have one<br>volume per year, each with their own number or issue, but I'm not
<br>sure of other benefits or ways of doing. Ideas? Opinions?<br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>newsletter mailing list<br><a href="mailto:newsletter@lists.osgeo.org">newsletter@lists.osgeo.org
</a><br><a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/newsletter">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/newsletter</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Daniel P. Ames, PhD, PE<br>Dept of Geosciences
<br>Idaho State University<br><a href="mailto:amesdani@isu.edu">amesdani@isu.edu</a><br><a href="http://www.hydromap.com">www.hydromap.com</a>