<div dir="ltr">I'm not sure how we'd measure participation as a gate to membership.<br><div><br></div><div>One alternative is to have an opt-in requirement each year, which will wean out the disengaged. That could just be a 'click this link in an email' type form. I would have thought a nominal annual fee, again, without auto-renewal, would work, but from what I hear it doesn't make much difference with OSM, and adds the requirement for us to set up a charging mechanism.</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 06:18, Cameron Shorter <<a href="mailto:cameron.shorter@gmail.com">cameron.shorter@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>Greg, I'm proposing that in a 1 level membership the only barrier
      be email list participation or some other OSGeo/OSM activity, and
      voting for board. I don't think people will be wanting to self
      identify with anything lower.<br>
    </p>
    <div class="gmail-m_1300502783694297257moz-cite-prefix">On 24/9/19 6:13 am, Greg Lauer wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      
      <div dir="ltr">The problem with this proposal is that we have
        barrier for general membership. I still support the 2 tier model
        and comfortable that we can manage the logistics with out too
        much issue</div>
      <div dir="ltr"><br>
      </div>
      <div dir="ltr">Greg</div>
      <div dir="ltr"><br>
        <blockquote type="cite">On 23 Sep 2019, at 18:30, John Bryant
          <a class="gmail-m_1300502783694297257moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:johnwbryant@gmail.com" target="_blank"><johnwbryant@gmail.com></a> wrote:<br>
          <br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div dir="ltr">
          <div dir="ltr">
            <div>Thanks all for a quite robust discussion on this
              important topic, it's really great to see this much
              engagement. There seems to be a fair bit of discomfort
              with the two tier model proposed, and I agree that it may
              introduce more complexity than we really want. To move
              forward, I'd like to propose a simplified alternative:</div>
            <div>
              <ul>
                <li>We have a single type of membership that confers
                  voting rights.</li>
                <li>To ensure a reasonable level of engagement, while
                  protecting the org against bad actors/hostile
                  takeover/etc, we roughly follow this process:</li>
                <ul>
                  <li>take nominations for new members</li>
                  <li>use an eligibility threshold that balances
                    accessibility with genuine engagement<br>
                  </li>
                  <li>include a ratification step that could be done by
                    the board, or a membership working group (TBD)</li>
                </ul>
              </ul>
              <div>This doesn't capture all the detail of how this would
                work, but if it's acceptable in broad strokes, I can
                update our draft policy and we can work through the
                details over next couple of days.</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Any objections?<br>
              </div>
            </div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
          </div>
          <span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
          <span>Oceania mailing list</span><br>
          <span><a class="gmail-m_1300502783694297257moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Oceania@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Oceania@lists.osgeo.org</a></span><br>
          <span><a class="gmail-m_1300502783694297257moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/oceania" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/oceania</a></span><br>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="gmail-m_1300502783694297257mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="gmail-m_1300502783694297257moz-quote-pre">_______________________________________________
Oceania mailing list
<a class="gmail-m_1300502783694297257moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Oceania@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Oceania@lists.osgeo.org</a>
<a class="gmail-m_1300502783694297257moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/oceania" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/oceania</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <pre class="gmail-m_1300502783694297257moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Cameron Shorter
Technology Demystifier
Open Technologies and Geospatial Consultant

M +61 (0) 419 142 254</pre>
  </div>

_______________________________________________<br>
Oceania mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Oceania@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Oceania@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/oceania" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/oceania</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div>Alex Leith<br></div>m: 0419189050</div></div>