<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:2fc2c5f10804080109v636feda2scf27bf715362da37@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">2008/4/8 Tomas Novotny <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:tomas.novotny@tmapy.cz"><tomas.novotny@tmapy.cz></a>:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> Thank you for response.
It looks like "not-smooth" map moving is problem only for me. When we have
same point of view we can try to do something with that.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
For future reference: not all browsers were created equal. When
talking about performance it would be really helpful if you gave on
indication of the speed of the system you are referring to and the
browser you're testing on. Without this information it's very easy to
talk past eachother.
</pre>
</blockquote>
I'm just comparing more mapping APIs on same platform - no matter if
old machine or new. The problem is in implementation. On old machine
the difference is only more significant.<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:2fc2c5f10804080109v636feda2scf27bf715362da37@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
At some point you mentioned IE6 on a 5yo machine. If you had mentioned
that upfront it might have been helpful. I'm not sure how many
developers here have such a platform.
</pre>
</blockquote>
I wouldn't say this about users - and applications are for them, aren't
they?<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:2fc2c5f10804080109v636feda2scf27bf715362da37@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
Have a nice day,
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>