Christopher,<br><br>Thanks for the answers, and for the positive feedbacks!<br><br>I just have an opinion I would like to share.<br><br><blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote">
...and that instead of having tile.php<br>
in the OpenLayers examples, we should simply remove it totally.<br></blockquote><br>Really? One thing that I liked most in OL is that there are<br>a lot of examples all in one single place, with all you need<br>to start playing with OL. In this sense, I think it's good to <br>
maintaing the php code in there. But that's my humble <br>thought as a user. As a developer I must agree that it <br>makes sense putting them on ka-Map only, so future <br>changes won't require an update on OL example files.<br>
<br>Anyway, I'll follow your recommendation and post those <br>informations on ka-Map list.<br><br>I'll also create an account on OL's trac to easier our<br>communication about these issues<br><br><blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote">
Any further comments on your tickets, I'll do through trac/seperate<br>
maisl to the list: thanks for the summary, and the hard work!<br></blockquote><br>Sorry, I didn't get it right. Are you saying that future techical <br>comments should be posted on trac?<br><br>regards,<br><br>Pedro Simonetti.<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">2008/4/27 Christopher Schmidt <<a href="mailto:crschmidt@metacarta.com">crschmidt@metacarta.com</a>>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 10:48:39AM -0300, Pedro Simonetti Garcia wrote:<br>
> Hi Christopher,<br>
><br>
> I'm new to OL community, so I don't know all the internal<br>
> proceedings / rules to report bugs, write tickets, and so on.<br>
> So, forgive me if I skip some steps.<br>
><br>
> I wrote the tickets #327 e #1519 of this list.<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://trac.openlayers.org/ticket/327" target="_blank">http://trac.openlayers.org/ticket/327</a><br>
<br>
</div>Right, I need to respond to this one, as the de facto maintainer of the<br>
ka-Map integration with OpenLayers. What it comes down to, breifly, is<br>
that I believe the fixes you have described should be happening<br>
upstream, with the ka-Map project, and that instead of having tile.php<br>
in the OpenLayers examples, we should simply remove it totally.<br>
Similarly, 1518 below: the precache.php.txt file does not belong in<br>
OpenLayers, but I don't see anything particularly wrong with the<br>
KaMapCache layer, if you're interested in it.<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
> <a href="http://trac.openlayers.org/ticket/1519" target="_blank">http://trac.openlayers.org/ticket/1519</a><br>
<br>
</div>This is simple, and I just haven't learned enough about translations to<br>
test them yet, so I haven't done anything with it. It looksfine in<br>
general.<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
> I also wrote a comment on issue #1108, which is related to<br>
> the #864 that is flagged to 2.7 milestone.<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://trac.openlayers.org/ticket/1108" target="_blank">http://trac.openlayers.org/ticket/1108</a><br>
> <a href="http://trac.openlayers.org/ticket/864" target="_blank">http://trac.openlayers.org/ticket/864</a><br>
><br>
> I'm also the author of the #1518, which is related to the #1519:<br>
><br>
</div><div class="Ih2E3d">> And I wish to help with this issues, but I'm not sure<br>
> exactly how to proceed. I reported those tickets using a<br>
> anonymous username/pass. Should I create a account<br>
> and post a comment in those tickets to make easier future<br>
> discussions about them?<br>
<br>
</div>That would be good, yeah.<br>
<br>
Your patches, in general, look fine, and I'm glad to know you're still<br>
aware of them and looking to push them forward. So long as that's the<br>
case, there's no problem leaving them in the current milestone. I'm<br>
mosty looking to push a lot of things that people have opened and<br>
forgotten about forward, if there is no active work on them.<br>
<br>
Any further comments on your tickets, I'll do through trac/seperate<br>
maisl to the list: thanks for the summary, and the hard work!<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
> If you are interested in my help, please let me know.<br>
><br>
> my best regards,<br>
><br>
> Pedro Simonetti.<br>
><br>
> 2008/4/27 Christopher Schmidt <<a href="mailto:crschmidt@metacarta.com">crschmidt@metacarta.com</a>>:<br>
><br>
> > The 2.7 ticket list is a mess. I'd like to put some effort into cleaning<br>
> > it up, but to be honest, it's a bit of a big job for me alone.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > <a href="http://trac.openlayers.org/query?status=new&status=assigned&status=reopened&group=type&milestone=2.7+Release" target="_blank">http://trac.openlayers.org/query?status=new&status=assigned&status=reopened&group=type&milestone=2.7+Release</a><br>
> ><br>
> > We have 105 tickets in this release.<br>
> ><br>
> > Although some metadata is wrong:<br>
> > * 38 are bugs<br>
> > * 57 are features<br>
> > * 10 are tasks<br>
> ><br>
> > Some of these have active work being done on them. Some of them just<br>
> > need a thorough review. Some of them are probably not being actively<br>
> > worked on, or are just an idea.<br>
> ><br>
> > I think that if there is a ticket here that you consider yourself<br>
> > 'owner' of -- for example, if you reported it -- and you are no longer<br>
> > actively working on this ticket, that you move it to a different<br>
> > milestone than the 2.7 milestone. There is one for 2.8 -- if you're not<br>
> > currently working on it, but you still intend to at some near-future<br>
> > point, that might be a good place to put it. If you don't intend to get<br>
> > back to it, but you're still interested in the functionality, please<br>
> > feel free to toss it to the "Future" milestone. Note that this is all<br>
> > just my opinion, since we don't have any strong rules on this... would<br>
> > love to hear others opinions.<br>
> ><br>
> > I don't think we have any specific plans for 2.7 at this point, but I'd<br>
> > personally like to keep our releases a bit more release-early<br>
> > release-often than 2.6 ended up being, and the current 100+ tickets that<br>
> > are open is just a bit overwhelming for me...<br>
> ><br>
> > Looking forward to hearing/seeing more discussion.<br>
> ><br>
> > Regards,<br>
> > --<br>
> > Christopher Schmidt<br>
> > MetaCarta<br>
> > _______________________________________________<br>
> > Dev mailing list<br>
> > <a href="mailto:Dev@openlayers.org">Dev@openlayers.org</a><br>
> > <a href="http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev" target="_blank">http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev</a><br>
> ><br>
<br>
</div></div><font color="#888888">--<br>
Christopher Schmidt<br>
MetaCarta<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>