<p>You caught me Eric. I thought GeoExt ux and commented on OpenLayers addins. You are absolutely right. The current addins structure demands one repo per assume. </p>
<p>Sorry for the noise. </p>
<p>Andreas. </p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Nov 23, 2011 11:52 AM, "Eric Lemoine" <<a href="mailto:eric.lemoine@camptocamp.com">eric.lemoine@camptocamp.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Andreas Hocevar <<a href="mailto:ahocevar@opengeo.org">ahocevar@opengeo.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> For official addins, wouldn't it make sense to just have an addins repo<br>
> under the openlayers organization? The current addins folder in the svn repo<br>
> could then be imported into github, and addins maintainers could get access<br>
> to that repo.<br>
<br>
With a single repo people who want to use a single addin will need to<br>
fetch all addins. And if we have a single repo I think the current<br>
addin structure no longer makes sense.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Eric Lemoine<br>
<br>
Camptocamp France SAS<br>
Savoie Technolac, BP 352<br>
73377 Le Bourget du Lac, Cedex<br>
<br>
Tel : 00 33 4 79 44 44 96<br>
Mail : <a href="mailto:eric.lemoine@camptocamp.com">eric.lemoine@camptocamp.com</a><br>
<a href="http://www.camptocamp.com" target="_blank">http://www.camptocamp.com</a><br>
</blockquote></div>