To describe the situation in more detail. The vectors originally matched up with a Landsatt 7 image, and were all referenced into WGS84. I reprojected and converted the vectors to EPSG:4326 and GML using GDAL to upload them. I'm now overlaying them on a NASA WMS and there's a noticeable mis-alignment. This may well be a hiccup in my methodology, but I would think in this case a bandaid might be useful...<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Christopher Schmidt <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:crschmidt@metacarta.com">crschmidt@metacarta.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 03:42:03PM +0300, Nicholas Efremov-Kendall wrote:<br>
> Hi all,<br>
> I've noticed a little alignment issue between my GML data and a WMS service.<br>
> I was wondering if there was a way to specify a single consistent offset for<br>
> the GML data, and the WMS base layer in OL, rather than playing around with<br>
> re-referencing the vectors?<br>
<br>
</div>Nope. But it's not the first time it's been requested, so I wouldn't<br>
be opposed to taking a patch.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<font color="#888888">--<br>
Christopher Schmidt<br>
MetaCarta<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Nicholas Efremov-Kendall<br>Fulbright Student 2009-2010, Ukraine<br><a href="mailto:nefremov@artsci.wustl.edu">nefremov@artsci.wustl.edu</a><br>c/o Halyna Yerko<br>
Balzaka 92a, Kv 27<br>02232<br>Kyiv, Ukraine<br>(mob) +380963576524<br>