<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">The RFC looks good to me too. The
      process of introducing and passing proposals is straightforward,
      with a process for working through dispute, using methods that
      we've seen used successfully elsewhere. <br>
      <br>
      I don't have anything to add, except perhaps a mention that
      adding/removing individual packages from the distribution doesn't
      <i>necessarily </i>need an RFC, but that it is good form to
      announce on the mailing list in advance of intention to do so. <br>
      <br>
      cheers,
      <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">matt wilkie
--------------------------------------------
Geomatics Analyst
Information Management and Technology
Yukon Department of Environment
10 Burns Road * Whitehorse, Yukon * Y1A 4Y9
867-667-8133 Tel * 867-393-7003 Fax
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://environmentyukon.gov.yk.ca/geomatics/">http://environmentyukon.gov.yk.ca/geomatics/</a>
-------------------------------------------- </pre>
      On 25/09/2013 3:34 PM, Tamas Szekeres wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote class=" cite"
id="mid_CACALY_RZCROE6HXZAqjo_A2dVCvRx0ck_4CQhAyQ_h_VPAp_1g_mail_gmail_com"
cite="mid:CACALY+RZCROE6HXZAqjo+A2dVCvRx0ck-4CQhAyQ_h=VPAp-1g@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">Frank,
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>The <a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo4w/wiki/rfc1_pmc"
            target="_blank">RFC</a> looks pretty good, thanks for
          putting that together. Once the PSC is formed, I'm keen on
          writing a second one where we could start thinking about the
          primary objectives and requirements of the system we should
          realize, I think we all have quite some ideas, and experiences
          in creating windows builds (both positive and negative) which
          makes it possible to find out the right direction to follow.</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>I also think packaging on Windows is a different thing,
          other platforms may apply for a separate governance regarding
          to the binary distributions, there might be some common
          aspects, though.</div>
        <div>
          <br>
        </div>
        <div>Best regards,</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Tamas</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">2013/9/25 Frank Warmerdam <span
            dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:warmerdam@pobox.com" target="_blank">warmerdam@pobox.com</a>></span><br>
          <blockquote id="Cite_7865583" class="gmail_quote cite"
            style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc
            solid;padding-left:1ex">Folks,<br>
            <br>
            I have initiated an RFC for a project management committee
            for<br>
            OSGeo4W.  I'd encourage everyone interested in participating
            to joint<br>
            the osgeo4w-dev mailing list and to continue detailed
            discussion<br>
            there.<br>
            <br>
             <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/osgeo4w-dev"
              target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/osgeo4w-dev</a><br>
            <br>
            I think this list (osgeo-discuss) is a great place to
            discuss linkages<br>
            between different packaging efforts.<br>
            <br>
            Best regards,<br>
            Frank<br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>