[pgrouting-dev] Quick 2.0 Update

[Daniel Kastl]

> OK, that is great. I'm happy with the progress so far and I hope to make
> good progress on getting cmake to pull everything into an extension. Once
> that happens, can turn my focus the actual code.
>
> I also noticed that the CMake site as a CTest package. I have not looked
> at it but I'm wondering if it might not be good for building our test
> infrastructure with. Have anyone looked at this?
>
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/**CMake#CTest<http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake#CTest>
>
> While it is important that we do something with respect to testing, I do
> not want to jump in without looking into what postgis and mapserver
> projects are already doing.
>

I think it's good to look what related projects do. And maybe they can
tell, why they choose this tool and not another one.
Or maybe they can say if they are happy with their decision.

Once I looked for some extensions I found pgTAP, which could be also
interesting: http://pgtap.org/
I have no preference so far. With past decisions it was usually good to
look at what other OSGeo projects do.

Daniel



-- 
Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan
eMail: daniel.kastl at georepublic.de
Web: http://georepublic.de
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pgrouting-dev/attachments/20130307/78fc7603/attachment.html>