Hi Yasir,<div><br></div><div>I haven't seen this yet. Thank you for the link!</div><div>If you want to have the original ID available later, this patch might be a good idea. </div><div>The compile problem mentioned in the blog and included to the patch should be solved in the meanwhile.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Daniel</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/7/22 Yasir Shoaib <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:yasirshoa@gmail.com">yasirshoa@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Hi,<br><br>There is a mention about a perverse osm_id patch here:<br><a href="http://techblog.strange-quark.com/2010/05" target="_blank">http://techblog.strange-quark.com/2010/05</a><br><br>Is this patch required? If so, not very clear about the affect of this patch?<br>
<br>Thanks,<br><font color="#888888">Yasir<br>
</font><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Pgrouting-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org">Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>