<div>Hi Pieter,<br></div><div>Current PostGIS 64 bit windows binary built with mingw 64,</div><div>and I think following build instruction was finally used.</div><div><a href="http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/wiki/DevWikiWinMingW64">http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/wiki/DevWikiWinMingW64</a></div>
<div> </div><div>In case of pgRouting, remove PostGIS specific instruction(GDAL/GEOS/GTK+ .etc) from above site,</div><div>and add pgRouting specific instruction(Boost/CGAL(with GMP)/GAUL).</div><div> </div><div>Currently, I think that pgRouting mingw 64 bit build will be spent 3-5 days,</div>
<div>while msvc 64 bit build will be spent 20-30 days,</div><div>because msvc approach needs full analyzation of Shooting Star(use Boost Graph Library) algorithm,</div><div>and I have not enough knowledge about Boost Graph Library and C++ template technique.</div>
<div> </div><div>Regards,<br></div><div class="gmail_quote">2012/6/9 Pieter du Plooy <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pjduplooy@zpanelcp.com" target="_blank">pjduplooy@zpanelcp.com</a>></span><br><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid" class="gmail_quote">
Hi Sanak<br><br>Isn't Postgis for 64 bit windows built with mingw?<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Sanak <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:geosanak@gmail.com" target="_blank">geosanak@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid" class="gmail_quote"><div>Hi Stephen Woodbridge, Organization Members,<br></div>
<div>Thanks for your reply.<br></div><div>I didn't noticed about "extension",</div>
<div>and release 2.0 really include lot of TODOs...</div><div> </div>
<div>So, if windows 64bit demand is large and in a hurry,</div>
<div>I will try mingw 64bit build at first for quick approach,</div><div>and later try msvc(Microsoft Visual Studio C++) 64bit build for release 2.0.</div><div>(msvc approach will be require many source(.h/.c/.cpp) changes,</div>
<div>because of poor C99 support .etc, and it's no longer packaging issue.)</div><div> </div><div>mingw-diff : <a href="https://github.com/sanak/pgrouting/compare/master...mingw" target="_blank">https://github.com/sanak/pgrouting/compare/master...mingw</a><span style="width:16px;padding-right:16px;min-height:16px"></span><span style="width:16px;padding-right:16px;min-height:16px"></span><br>
msvc-diff : <a href="https://github.com/sanak/pgrouting/compare/master...msvc" target="_blank">https://github.com/sanak/pgrouting/compare/master...msvc</a><span style="width:16px;padding-right:16px;min-height:16px"></span><span style="width:16px;padding-right:16px;min-height:16px"></span></div>
<div> </div><div>Windows msvc build advantages is as follows.</div>
<div>1. PostgreSQL 8.4+ itself has been build with msvc8+.</div><div>2. Process debbuging is possible. (see <a href="http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Getting_a_stack_trace_of_a_running_PostgreSQL_backend_on_Windows" target="_blank">http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Getting_a_stack_trace_of_a_running_PostgreSQL_backend_on_Windows</a><span style="width:16px;padding-right:16px;min-height:16px"></span><span style="width:16px;padding-right:16px;min-height:16px"></span> )</div>
<div>3. More easier development and crash investigation.</div><div> </div><div>But, those advantages may be useful only Windows enterprise user or developer.</div><div> </div><div>Regards,</div><div><div>
<div> </div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
2012/6/8 Stephen Woodbridge <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:woodbri@swoodbridge.com" target="_blank">woodbri@swoodbridge.com</a>></span><br><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid" class="gmail_quote">
We currently do not have a plan for a release. In fact we do not have a developer that can do the release. I have spent a little bit of time trying to identify what needs to be done, but have had no time to work on it beyond the little bit of planning I have done.<br>
<br>
I would agree that 2.0 should be targeted at PostgreSQL 9.x and PostGIS 2.0+ which probably means we should look into the new postgresql<br>
CREATE EXTENSION pgrouting;<br>
system for installation.<br>
<br>
If any developer(s) would like to step up to this task or any of the release tasks, I'm willing to help out and share the effort and make sure we have come continuity of effort.<br>
<br>
And as Daniel commented funding or sponsorship could help. The TRSP routing was customer funded and the core code development was done under contract by Ashraf (aka: Roni) in Bangladesh, a former GSoC student.<br>
<br>
Or eventually, I will have to upgrade my systems to Postgresql 9+ and postGIS 2.0+ and be forced to figure this out in self-defense :)<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
-Steve<div><br>
<br>
On 6/7/2012 8:48 AM, Sanak wrote:<br>
</div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid" class="gmail_quote"><div>
Hi Pieter, Recardo,<br>
Thanks for quick response!<br>
Hi Daniel, Organization Members,<br>
Because PostGIS Windows 64 bit installer support only ver2.0+,<br>
so it may be better that pgRouting Windows 64 bit binary support only<br>
ver2.0+,<br>
but, is there 2.0 release plan?<br>
(I guess that 2.0 release include TRSP to core, Shooting Star to extra,<br>
Unit test .etc)<br>
And can I join release 2.0 development(mainly Windows 64 bit porting)?<br></div>
2012/6/7 Daniel Kastl <<a href="mailto:daniel@georepublic.de" target="_blank">daniel@georepublic.de</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:daniel@georepublic.de" target="_blank">daniel@georepublic.de</a>><u></u>><div>
<br>
<br>
PS: You can contact Sanak directly or you can donate to pgRouting<br>
project and we will forward the sponsorship to him.<br>
<br>
Latter is better for me, because I am not so good at English. (I always<br>
use translation site)<br>
And I hope that appropriate donation to pgRouting project exists.<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Ricardo Bayley<br></div><div>
<<a href="mailto:ricardo.bayley@gmail.com" target="_blank">ricardo.bayley@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:ricardo.bayley@gmail.com" target="_blank">ricardo.bayley@gmail.<u></u>com</a>>> wrote:<br>
<br>
likewise<br>
+1 for a pgrouting windows 64bit<br>
<br>
2012/6/6 Pieter du Plooy <<a href="mailto:pjduplooy@zpanelcp.com" target="_blank">pjduplooy@zpanelcp.com</a><br></div>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:pjduplooy@zpanelcp.com" target="_blank">pjduplooy@zpanelcp.com</a><u></u>>><div><br>
<br>
Hi guys<br>
<br>
My first post here, and just to say +1 from me for a 64 bit<br>
Windows build of pgrouting.<br>
<br>
Regards<br>
<br>
Pieter<br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
Pgrouting-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.<u></u>org</a><br></div>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Pgrouting-users@lists.<u></u>osgeo.org</a>><div><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-<u></u>users</a><span style="width:16px;padding-right:16px;min-height:16px"></span><span style="width:16px;padding-right:16px;min-height:16px"></span><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
Pgrouting-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.<u></u>org</a><br></div>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Pgrouting-users@lists.<u></u>osgeo.org</a>><div><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-<u></u>users</a><span style="width:16px;padding-right:16px;min-height:16px"></span><span style="width:16px;padding-right:16px;min-height:16px"></span><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan<br></div>
eMail: <a href="mailto:daniel.kastl@georepublic.de" target="_blank">daniel.kastl@georepublic.de</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:daniel.kastl@georepublic.de" target="_blank">daniel.kastl@<u></u>georepublic.de</a>><br>
Web: <a href="http://georepublic.de" target="_blank">http://georepublic.de</a><span style="width:16px;padding-right:16px;min-height:16px"></span><span style="width:16px;padding-right:16px;min-height:16px"></span> <<a href="http://georepublic.de/" target="_blank">http://georepublic.de/</a><span style="width:16px;padding-right:16px;min-height:16px"></span><span style="width:16px;padding-right:16px;min-height:16px"></span>><br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
Pgrouting-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.<u></u>org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Pgrouting-users@lists.<u></u>osgeo.org</a>><div>
<br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-<u></u>users</a><span style="width:16px;padding-right:16px;min-height:16px"></span><span style="width:16px;padding-right:16px;min-height:16px"></span><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
Pgrouting-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.<u></u>org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-<u></u>users</a><span style="width:16px;padding-right:16px;min-height:16px"></span><span style="width:16px;padding-right:16px;min-height:16px"></span><br>
</div></blockquote><div><div>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
Pgrouting-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.<u></u>org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-<u></u>users</a><span style="width:16px;padding-right:16px;min-height:16px"></span><span style="width:16px;padding-right:16px;min-height:16px"></span><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Pgrouting-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users</a><span style="width:16px;padding-right:16px;min-height:16px"></span><span style="width:16px;padding-right:16px;min-height:16px"></span><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Pgrouting-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org">Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>