[postgis-devel] GEOS Interfaces

[Paul Ramsey]

True enough. However, one of the things I heard from several people at 
MUM was that our 0.X numbering scheme was hindering adoption 
psycologically with decision makers. We have been running large 
productions on PostGIS for years now, time to get to 1.0. :)

strk wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 09:55:41AM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> 
>>Strk,
>>Now that you have broken backward compatibility with the new GEOS 
>>interfaces, does the CVS postgis work against the CVS geos? From a 
>>release PoV I would like to do a PostGIS 1.0 / GEOS 1.4 release that are 
>>mutually compatible.
>>Paul
> 
> 
> Yes, this is what I wrote in my previous mail.
> Postgis will work with GEOS-1.0 *and* GEOS-1.4.
> 
> BTW: GEOS code is still young. IMO it shouldn't have taken version 1.0
>      as the interface consistency issue was already known.
> 
> --strk;
> 
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel


-- 
       __
      /
      | Paul Ramsey
      | Refractions Research
      | Email: pramsey at refractions.net
      | Phone: (250) 885-0632
      \_