[postgis-devel] release status

[strk at refractions.net]

On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 02:07:03PM -0000, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> Hi strk,
> 
> The only other thing to mention would be the compile-time warnings under
> Win32 (it appears that the Win32 header files also define a typedef 'byte'
> which clashes with the definition used by the parser). Unfortunately I don't
> think I'm going to have time to fix this for a while, but I thought I should
> mention it in case anyone else can fix it in time for the release.

Would uchar be ok ?
--strk;

> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Mark.
> 
> ------------------------
> WebBased Ltd
> South West Technology Centre
> Tamar Science Park
> Plymouth
> PL6 8BT 
> 
> T: +44 (0)1752 791021
> F: +44 (0)1752 791023
> W: http://www.webbased.co.uk
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net 
> > [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On 
> > Behalf Of strk at refractions.net
> > Sent: 18 February 2005 07:51
> > To: postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> > Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] release status
> > 
> > 
> > The mapserver connector bug seems to be fixed, the only issue 
> > left is the spatial_ref_sys entries.
> > 
> > The reported *bogus* entry was one of Paris ones  (27582).
> > We have more then a single entries for Paris, sharing most of 
> > the parameters that requires correction, so what I don't know 
> > is wheter all of them are really *wrong* or if different 
> > PROJ4 versions handle different parameters.
> > 
> > Frank, can you tell us something about this ?
> > 
> > Finally we have a minor problem with FLEX and YACC variables 
> > being somehow overidden by postgresql Makefiles, did anyone 
> > here ever compiled postgis using different lexical analyzer / 
> > parser generators ? Should we directly invoke 'flex' and 
> > 'yacc' instead of using variables ?
> > 
> > --strk;
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel