[postgis-devel] Re: [HACKERS] caches lifetime with SQL vs PL/PGSQL procs

[strk at refractions.net]

It is embarassing for me, but I could not reproduce the bug. :(
Maybe I just ended up with a corrupted database (or I was just too tired).
Behaviour seems to be the same for both SQL and pl/pgsql functions on 
a new database (and I got rid of the old one).

Sorry.

--strk;

On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 06:46:04PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> strk at refractions.net writes:
> > I've tried with 7.4.3 - *good* results with both SQL and PL/PGSQL 
> > (actually even less that best 8.0.1: 12Mb)
> 
> > I think this makes it a bug...
> 
> You haven't actually provided a test case that would let someone else
> reproduce the problem ...
> 
> 			regards, tom lane