[postgis-devel] Is there a reason those GArray functions aren't documented?
kneufeld at refractions.net
Tue Jul 1 08:51:22 PDT 2008
Obe, Regina wrote:
> I was assuming it is because we consider them internal like functions
> since they are used to form the aggregate functions and may be something
> that changes in the future.
I think this is exactly why they were never documented. I suppose we
could add an "Internals" section to the documentation and catalog these
as well as all the _ST* methods.
> I finally found a use for them somewhat directly and felt a little dirty
> using them.
> Case in point. Someone asked me how to formulate a polygon if he has a
> known finite set of points he pulled out of a hat (well a hat that forms
> points forming a closed ring - not coming from an aggregate rollup)
> After looking thru the docs and the closest thing I could come up with
> using documented
> functions was
> which would require me to get my points into a multipoint (using yet
> another undocumented GArray function or using a messy union all).
I think this, or the simliar approach
ST_MakePolygon(ST_MakeLine(geometry set)), is how one would build up a
Polygon - construct linestrings that define the exterior and interior
rings, and use them to define the boundary of the polygon.
More information about the postgis-devel