[postgis-devel] 1.3.4?

[Mark Cave-Ayland]

Paul Ramsey wrote:
> OK, Mark's tickets are closed.
> 
> That just leaves the handling of NULL and = and ST_Equals as issues.
> I'm inclined to deal with *none* of these, since they all change
> behavior, which is not good for a point release.  However, if people
> are convinced that certain of these behaviors are UNAMBIGUOUSLY WRONG,
> then we could change them.
> 
> I can see changing the aggregates to be more NULL savvy as one of those cases.
> 
> P.

+1. For 1.3 let's look at mimicking the standard aggregate behaviour 
with respect to NULLs and leave the =/ST_Equals() debate for a later 
release.


ATB,

Mark.

-- 
Mark Cave-Ayland
Sirius Corporation - The Open Source Experts
http://www.siriusit.co.uk
T: +44 870 608 0063