[postgis-devel] autobuild cleanup - version revisited

[Kevin Neufeld]

So, branch is 1.3.SVN and trunk is 1.4.SVN?
-- Kevin

Paul Ramsey wrote:
> OK, wrong again, mapserver on trunk is currently 5.3-dev, so there you
> go. I know nothing.
> 
> P.
> 
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Paul Ramsey <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca> wrote:
>> I really can't recall. I think I might have just been aping mapserver,
>> which simply increments its versions in trunk when releases are
>> tagged, so that mapserver 5.4 already "exists", though only as trunk.
>>
>> P.
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 6:49 AM, Obe, Regina <robe.dnd at cityofboston.gov> wrote:
>>> Paul,
>>>
>>> Nudge Nudge - you have any opinion on this or do we have your blessing
>>> to put the SVN back in the version numbers of 1.3.4 and 1.4.
>>>
>>> Will the sky fall?  Do we just need to change POSTGIS_MICRO_VERSION or
>>> are there other changes to prevent things from breaking?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Regina
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
>>> [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Obe,
>>> Regina
>>> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 6:57 AM
>>> To: PostGIS Development Discussion
>>> Subject: RE: [postgis-devel] autobuild cleanup
>>>
>>> Mark,
>>> Sorry for the long-windedness (I was hoping to rank higher on dramatic
>>> effect :).
>>>
>>> Is it just the Version.config that controls that and would we put SVN as
>>> part of the
>>> POSTGIS_MICRO_VERSION.  Although I vote to wait for Paul's opinion since
>>> I assume he had some reason for doing that and perhaps have him do it.
>>> Guess he doesn't get up until later in the day.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Regina
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
>>> [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Mark
>>> Cave-Ayland
>>> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 5:46 AM
>>> To: PostGIS Development Discussion
>>> Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] autobuild cleanup
>>>
>>> Obe, Regina wrote:
>>>
>>>> Me too.  Very important. While I think we should encourage users
>>>> (somewhat) to test out and use 1.3.4 before released, I think its
>>>> important they understand it is a moving (but somewhat stable target).
>>>>
>>>> I think we should put the SVN back in the version 1.3.4 until actually
>>>> released.  It was annoying me a bit that I don't see it in my
>>>> postgis_full_version() output and was worried what if I forget to
>>>> upgrade to the new one (or compile against my old source) when it is
>>>> released, how would I be able to tell the difference?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Regina
>>> I think that was exactly the point I was trying to make (but in a less
>>> long-winded fashion!). Does anyone still have any objections to adding
>>> the SVN suffix back into the SVN branches? If not, Regina, would you
>>> like to add them back in?
>>>
>>>
>>> ATB,
>>>
>>> Mark.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mark Cave-Ayland
>>> Sirius Corporation - The Open Source Experts
>>> http://www.siriusit.co.uk
>>> T: +44 870 608 0063
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> postgis-devel mailing list
>>> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
>>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>>> -----------------------------------------
>>> The substance of this message, including any attachments, may be
>>> confidential, legally privileged and/or exempt from disclosure
>>> pursuant to Massachusetts law. It is intended
>>> solely for the addressee. If you received this in error, please
>>> contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> postgis-devel mailing list
>>> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
>>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> postgis-devel mailing list
>>> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
>>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel