[postgis-devel] Any chance we can get a 1.3.6 RC1 out this week
kneufeld at refractions.net
Tue Apr 21 14:21:28 PDT 2009
It looks like I have some time to recreate Hudson, the auto buildbot we had working last month before our server went
I miss having the documentation and tarball constantly up-to-date on the main website, so I'm on that now ... unless
Paul, you wanted to take that over ...
Paul Ramsey wrote:
> (And I really tried to do this more mechanically, following the 'how
> to release', which will be my goal going forward, so mistakes in this
> tarball can be used to fix the automated parts of how to release, and
> hopefully automate it more.)
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Paul Ramsey <pramsey at opengeo.org> wrote:
>> I've wrapped an 'rc1' and placed it here:
>> Please test it a bit and then we'll announce to the wider audience.
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Paragon Corporation <lr at pcorp.us> wrote:
>>> I've been testing under Windows 2003 and seems okay - comparing some stress
>>> tests between 1.3.5 and 1.3.6 (though was using GEOS 3.1.0 -- still need to
>>> test with 3.0.3.
>>> My tests on 8.4 beta 1 under windows I think I'm seeing some discrepancies
>>> between ST_Within behavior, but could be my diffing is out of wack and
>>> haven't determined if its an issue with 1.3.6 or 1.4.0. I had installed
>>> both under the same 8.4 beta 1 install in separate more or less identical
>>> databases. Still yet to test on Linux.
>>> It would really help if we have an up to date tar ball for both at the very
>>> The Union behavior between the 1.3.6 and 1.4.0 is very different, but I
>>> think that is expected and under an OpenJump microscope the results at least
>>> have the same number of points and look visually the same.
>>> postgis-devel mailing list
>>> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
More information about the postgis-devel