[postgis-devel] Can we do a final 1.3.6RC2 and go live

[Paragon Corporation]

+1 for me too.

On a side note:

Can we PLEASE have a 1.5.  We have a fair number of not so big ticket items
that add important new functionality (and those can't be put in a 1.4.*
release that I don't care to have stalled waiting for 2.0. I think jumping
from a 1.4 to a 2.0 is at best lofty thinking.

Thanks,
Regina

-----Original Message-----
From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Kevin
Neufeld
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 1:15 AM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] Can we do a final 1.3.6RC2 and go live

If it's fixed in trunk and it's not really an issue for 1.3, then my vote is
to leave it for any small patch release we may do for 1.3.7.
-- Kevin

Paragon Corporation wrote:
> Kevin,
>
> I guess the only thing that did fail that I thought we had fixed and 
> then realized we only did it for 1.4 is this one
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/104
>
> But it works, just gives warnings and larger shape files I loaded and 
> dumped seem to work fine too.  I guess since the problem has always 
> been there its probably not worth fixing for 1.3 series and risk 
> breaking it in unless if someone feels its worthwhile.
>
> Thanks,
> Regina
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
> [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of 
> Kevin Neufeld
> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 12:18 AM
> To: PostGIS Development Discussion
> Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] Can we do a final 1.3.6RC2 and go live
>
> Yes, I'm testing the branch and trunk against 8.2.13, 8.3.7, and 8.4beta.
> http://office.refractions.net:1500/view/PostGIS%20Branch/
>
> 1.3.6 passes without a hitch on 8.4.
> http://office.refractions.net:1500/view/PostGIS%20Branch/job/PostGIS-b
> ranch- regress84/ws/regress_results/results.log/*view*/
>
> -- Kevin
>
> Paragon Corporation wrote:
>   
>> I finally got around to testing 1.3.6RC1 and 1.3.6SVN on my OpenSUSE
>> 11 running  PostgreSQL 8.4beta1 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC 
>> gcc (GCC) 3.4.6
>> 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-10), 32-bit
>>  Postgis 1.3.6SVN - 2009-04-30 03:38:51
>>    GEOS: 3.1.0-CAPI-1.5.0
>>    PROJ: Rel. 4.6.0, 21 Dec 2007
>>
>> I'm content everything works as expected.  
>> Make check passes except for kml which didn't pass in 1.3.5 anyway.
>>
>> Kevin -- did you ever test 1.3.6 on 8.4 beta or you just tested the
>> 1.4 branch?
>>  I would have assumed I would get similar false positive errors you 
>> got in
>> 1.4 make check in my 1.3.6 tests, but I didn't.  I have yet to do a 
>> make check on 1.4 against 8.4.
>>
>> Anyrate -- can we have 1 more RC just so people can test those last 
>> minute changes we put in and go live next week if no one complains?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Regina
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> postgis-devel mailing list
>> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>>   
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>   
_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel