[postgis-devel] postgis-1.5.sql

[Paul Ramsey]

Well, problem solved then, if I'm the only one who ever objected (and
at a different circumstance at that). I guess I don't have the courage
of my convictions.

P.

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Chris Hodgson <chodgson at refractions.net> wrote:
> Paul, you bring this question up so often it makes me wonder if there really
> is a reason...
>
> http://postgis.refractions.net/pipermail/postgis-devel/2009-August/006599.html
>
> It all pints back to:
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/94
>
> Where it seems the argument against numbering the .sql was that you'd have
> to also number the .so, which you didn't want to do because it complicated
> the update process.
>
> Chris
>
> Paul Ramsey wrote:
>>
>> What do we think about numbering the SQL file? I think it seems wise, is
>> there a reason to not do it?
>>
>> P
>> _______________________________________________
>> postgis-devel mailing list
>> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>