[postgis-devel] cleaning docs

[strk]

Uhm.. if we want 'clean' rule to never drop things that end up 
in the tarball then we shouldn't be dropping images as well ?
The images needed for documentation, that is.
Or are those one fine to be generated by builder ?

In any case I think removing *comments.sql is fine on 'maintainer-clean', 
right ?

--strk;


On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 05:28:15AM -0500, Paragon Corporation wrote:
> Yes its intentional I think. It might have been related to my complaint that
> the tar balls weren't including the comments because they were being wiped
> out.
> 
> Though now can't remember.  I think Paul had made the changes.
> 
> Refer to http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/380
> 
> I don't understand all that transpired there but might answer your
> questions.
> 
> Thanks,
> Regina
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
> [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of strk
> Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 6:31 PM
> To: postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> Subject: [postgis-devel] cleaning docs
> 
> Is it intentional for 'make clean' not to get rid of the documentation in
> doc/ ?
> 
> I see maintainer-clean removing HTML and PDF manuals but not the
> *comments.sql.
> 
> Also, I see 'clean' calling clean under html/image_src, which may corrupt
> the actual HTML manual, right ?
> 
> What about having 'clean' drop everything ?
> 
> --strk;
> 
>   ()   Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer
>   /\   http://strk.keybit.net/services.html
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel

-- 

  ()   Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer
  /\   http://strk.keybit.net/services.html