[postgis-devel] Speaking of openness and formality - finish vote on Bborie Park as a committer

[Jorge Arévalo]

On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Chris Hodgson <chodgson at refractions.net> wrote:
> Actually, +2 is what the Mapserver PSC is using according to the RFC I was
> copying from, and they have many more heads in their PSC. I believe the same
> wording is copied into GDAL.
>
> I think the idea is, not everyone in the PSC needs to know enough about
> everything to have a meaningful vote on everything. +2 means at least a
> motion and a 'second', both from people who are willing to support the
> proposition in a meaningful way, if it is necessary. It prevents a single
> person from just doing whatever they want, in theory, without forcing every
> decision to wait for every voter (or even half of the voters) to reply.
>
> After all, we can always rollback changes in the SVN and kick someone out
> later, it isn't the end of the world.
>
> Chris
>


Hello,

I'm not part of the PSC, but my vote would be a clear +1. Sorry for
answering so late.

Best regards,

-- 
Jorge Arévalo
Internet & Mobilty Division, DEIMOS
jorge.arevalo at deimos-space.com
http://es.linkedin.com/in/jorgearevalo80
http://mobility.grupodeimos.com/
http://gis4free.wordpress.com
http://geohash.org/ezjqgrgzz0g

> On 5/12/2011 11:46 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 05:37:49PM -0700, Chris Hodgson wrote:
>>>
>>> I thought this was already passed - as per RFC 1:
>>>
>>> "A proposal will be accepted if it receives +2 (including the author)
>>> and no vetoes (-1). "
>>
>> Does it still hold now that there's 5 heads in the PSC ?
>> I guess it should become +3.
>>
>> And now I wonder how many -0 or +0 it takes to change that...
>>
>> --strk
>>
>>   ()   Free GIS&  Flash consultant/developer
>>   /\   http://strk.keybit.net/services.html
>> _______________________________________________
>> postgis-devel mailing list
>> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>