[postgis-devel] [PostGIS] #964: Support for PostgreSQL 9.1+ new Extensions model

[PostGIS]

#964: Support for PostgreSQL 9.1+ new Extensions model
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  robe         |       Owner:  robe         
     Type:  enhancement  |      Status:  new          
 Priority:  medium       |   Milestone:  PostGIS 2.0.0
Component:  postgis      |     Version:  trunk        
 Keywords:               |  
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------

Comment(by robe):

 As discussed.  So are we in agreement of merginging in raster

 What should this extension be called?

 postgis or maybe postgis-2  or postgis_core.

 I was thinking about whether postgis_topology should be merged as well,
 and that one I think we need to keep separate because it is always
 installed in the topology schema.

 The way postgresl 9.1 extensions work, all the components of an extension
 need to be installed in the same schema toehrwise it will be confusing aif
 a user tries to switch the schema and it switches for some part of it and
 not all of it.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/964#comment:6>
PostGIS <http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/>
The PostGIS Trac is used for bug, enhancement & task tracking, a user and developer wiki, and a view into the subversion code repository of PostGIS project.