[postgis-devel] [PostGIS] #1653: [raster] ST_Transform & ST_Resample are confusing

PostGIS trac at osgeo.org
Mon Mar 12 10:59:42 PDT 2012


#1653: [raster] ST_Transform & ST_Resample are confusing
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  pracine      |       Owner:  pracine      
     Type:  enhancement  |      Status:  new          
 Priority:  critical     |   Milestone:  PostGIS 2.0.0
Component:  raster       |     Version:  trunk        
 Keywords:               |  
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------

Comment(by pramsey):

 Please try that patch, then we should decide. I've tracked down the
 "problem" with the portable snprintf, which is that it only supports
 exponents between -99 and 99. Which is more than enough size for our
 purposes,  but we have a KML test that exercises 1e300, which I've now
 determined is only just shy of the maximum that OSX will handle, 1e306.
 Basically, it's a semi-bogus test. I have a sandbox ready to bring the
 portable snprintf solution in, which will handle more cases than just the
 Win64 case. My hack sb.patch above is very specific to the bug and
 platform as reported by Regina.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/1653#comment:5>
PostGIS <http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/>
The PostGIS Trac is used for bug, enhancement & task tracking, a user and developer wiki, and a view into the subversion code repository of PostGIS project.


More information about the postgis-devel mailing list